Rule 29.7.County May Select Method of Providing Counsel
Rule 29. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR INDIGENT DEFENDANTS · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 17, 2026
Full Text of Rule 29.7
Plain-English Summary
Rule 29.7 does not mandate a single model for indigent defense. It hands each county a menu: run a public defender’s office, contract with a legal aid or defender society, use an agency dedicated to indigent defense, build a panel of private attorneys who take appointed cases, mix and match those approaches, or use some other means entirely.
The one fixed requirement is the outcome, not the structure — whatever method a county picks has to deliver adequate legal defense for indigents accused of felonies. That flexibility lets a small rural county with few attorneys structure its program differently from a large circuit with an established public defender staff, while holding both to the same baseline of adequacy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What methods can a county use to provide indigent defense?
A public defender system, legal aid and defender society, agency for indigent defense, a panel of private attorneys, a combination of these, or other means.
Does the rule require every county to use the same method?
No. Each county may select its own method, provided it results in adequate legal defense for indigents accused of felonies.
Can a county combine more than one method?
Yes. The rule expressly allows a combination of the listed approaches.
What standard must the chosen method meet?
It must provide adequate legal defense for indigents accused of felonies.
Who decides which method a county uses?
The rule does not name a specific decision-maker beyond referring to the county, leaving the choice of method to the county’s indigent defense program.