RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 25.7.Voluntary Recusal

Rule 25. RECUSAL · Last amended 1991 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceRule 25.7 lets a judge step aside voluntarily, on a party’s motion or on the judge’s own initiative, without that decision being treated as an admission or denial of any allegation raised, and sends the case to a replacement judge chosen through Rule 25.4’s selection procedure.

Full Text of Rule 25.7

Text size

If a judge, either on the motion of one of the parties or the judge’s own motion, voluntarily disqualifies, another judge, selected by the procedure set forth in Rule 25.4 above, shall be assigned to hear the matter involved. A voluntary recusal shall not be construed as either an admission or denial to any allegations which have been set out in the motion.

Plain-English Summary

Not every recusal starts with a contested motion and a fight over an affidavit. Rule 25.7 covers the judge who decides, whether prompted by a party’s motion or on the judge’s own initiative, to step aside from a case. That decision routes the case to a new judge picked through the same selection procedure Rule 25.4 lays out for contested disqualification motions.

The rule protects a judge who recuses voluntarily from any inference about what that recusal means. Stepping aside is not treated as an admission that the allegations in a party’s motion were true, and it is not treated as a denial of them either — it removes the judge from the case without resolving the underlying dispute one way or the other.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a judge recuse from a case without a party filing a motion first?

Yes. A judge may voluntarily disqualify either on the motion of one of the parties or on the judge’s own motion.

Who is assigned to a case after a judge voluntarily recuses?

Another judge, selected by the procedure set forth in Rule 25.4.

Does a voluntary recusal mean the judge is admitting the allegations in a party’s motion were true?

No. A voluntary recusal shall not be construed as either an admission or denial of the allegations set out in the motion.

If a judge recuses voluntarily, does that resolve whether the allegations against the judge were accurate?

No, the recusal itself does not decide that question one way or the other.

Does Rule 25.7 require the same affidavit and timing requirements that apply to a contested recusal motion?

No, the rule addresses voluntary recusal separately and directs that a replacement judge be selected under Rule 25.4’s procedure.

Amendment History

Amended effective January 31, 1991.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Uniform Superior Court Rules, published by the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: can judge recuse without motion GeorgiaUSCR Rule 25.7voluntary judge recusal Georgia superior courtjudge steps aside on own motion Georgiadoes voluntary recusal admit bias Georgia