RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 13.4.Conclusion

Rule 13. ARGUMENTS · Last amended 1997 · Last verified July 17, 2026

In one sentenceRule 13.4 gives the plaintiff, as the party bearing the burden of proof, both the opening and concluding argument in a civil case, unless the defendant introduces no evidence or admits the plaintiff’s prima facie case, in which situation the defendant instead gets to open and conclude.

Full Text of Rule 13.4

Text size

In civil actions, where the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff, the plaintiff is entitled to the opening and concluding arguments except that if the defendant introduces no evidence or admits a prima facie case, then the defendant shall be entitled to open and conclude.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 13.4 ties the right to open and close argument to who carries the burden of proof. In the ordinary civil case, that is the plaintiff, and the rule rewards that burden with the most valuable positions in argument — the plaintiff speaks first and speaks last, sandwiching the defendant’s argument in between.

That default flips in two situations: if the defendant puts on no evidence at all, or if the defendant concedes the plaintiff’s prima facie case outright. In either scenario, the defendant — not the plaintiff — gets to open and conclude instead. The logic tracks the same burden-of-proof principle from the other direction: once the defendant is not contesting the evidentiary record the plaintiff built, the case effectively turns on whatever the defendant is arguing, so the defendant gets the last word on it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who normally gets to open and conclude argument in a civil case?

The plaintiff, as the party bearing the burden of proof.

When does the defendant get to open and conclude instead?

If the defendant introduces no evidence or admits a prima facie case.

Does this rule apply to all civil cases equally?

It applies where the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff, which is the typical civil case posture.

Can both sides deliver the concluding argument?

No. The rule assigns the concluding argument to one side or the other, not both.

What triggers the shift away from the default plaintiff-opens-and-concludes rule?

Either the defendant introducing no evidence or the defendant admitting a prima facie case.

Amendment History

Amended effective October 9, 1997.

Source & verification. Rule text and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Uniform Superior Court Rules, published by the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia. Last verified July 17, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: georgia civil trial argument order ruleUSCR 13.4who opens and closes argument georgia civil caseburden of proof concluding argument georgiadefendant admits prima facie case argument order georgia