Rule 69.Execution.
Last amended October 1, 1995 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 69
Amendment History
[Amended 11-5-85, eff. 12-2-85; Amended eff. 10-1-95.]
Committee Comments
Committee Comments on 1973 Adoption
The rule applies to all proceedings, whether heretofore regarded as legal or equitable, and it provides that a writ of execution shall be the normal process for enforcement of a money judgment. The procedure on execution is to be in accordance with statute. See Code of Ala., §§ 6-9-1 through 6-9-150. In this respect the rule makes no change, for by statute enforcement of equity decrees has long been analogized to execution of a judgment at law. Code of Ala., Tit. 7, § 332. Thus in most circumstances execution has entirely supplanted the classical equitable method of enforcement by contempt proceedings. But the “unless” clause of the first sentence allows use of methods other than writ of execution in cases where such methods are proper and the court so orders; for example, a judgment debtor in an alimony case may be proceeded against by contempt and imprisonment. Ex parte Stephenson, 252 Ala. 316, 40 So.2d 716 (1949).
The third sentence makes the discovery procedures of Rules 26 to 37 available to the judgment creditor in aid of the judgment or execution. These procedures will be for the same purpose, but broader in their scope and simpler in their details, than the former remedies of a judgment creditor’s bill or a statutory supplementary proceeding. Code of Ala., §§ 6-6-200 through 6-6-204. The statutes cited thus will be superseded by this rule.
Committee Comments to Amendment Effective December 2, 1985
The December 2, 1985, amendment of Rule 69 is related to the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in Green v. Harbin, 615 F.Supp. 719 (N.D.Ala.1985), in which Alabama statutory procedures for garnishments and claims for exemption were successfully attacked on federal constitutional grounds. The same issues have been raised regarding Alabama’s execution procedures in Chapman v. Harbin, CV-84-HM-5707NE. This amendment rewrote Rule 69. As rewritten, it provides a procedural framework for executions which is consistent with the mandates of the decision in Green. The amended rule is designed to insure that a judgment debtor will receive express notice of his rights of exemption. The judgment debtor may then file a claim for exemption with the sheriff, in which event he shall also file a copy thereof with the clerk of the court. This rule does not relieve the sheriff of his duty to serve the judgment creditor in the manner set out in § 6-10-26, Code of Alabama 1975. A procedure and a timetable are established for contesting a claim of exemption and for holding a hearing with respect to such a contest. Provision is made for the mandatory release of property claimed as exempt, if the judgment creditor fails to file with the sheriff a timely contest of such a claim of exemption. Finally, the amended rule follows its predecessor in making the discovery procedures of Rules 26 through 37 available to the judgment creditor in aid of judgment or execution.
Committee Comments to October 1, 1995, Amendment to Rule 69
The amendment is technical. No substantive change is intended.
Plain-English Summary
Winning a money judgment is only half the battle; getting paid is the other half. Rule 69 supplies the mechanism for that second half. It directs the clerk to issue a writ of execution whenever a judgment creditor asks for one, and it folds in whatever statutory procedures apply so long as they do not conflict with the rule itself. The creditor tells the clerk what property to target, if known, and the debtor's last known address, and the clerk prepares the writ along with a notice explaining the debtor's right to claim certain property as exempt from seizure.
The sheriff carries out the actual levy or seizure and must hand the debtor both the writ and the exemption notice, delivering them in person when possible or by mail or posting when the debtor cannot be reached directly. Once served, the debtor has a window to file a notarized claim asserting that specific property is exempt, which pauses any sale of that property. The creditor can challenge that claim by filing a timely contest with the sheriff; if the creditor does so, the matter goes back to the court for a hearing. If the creditor lets the deadline pass without contesting, the sheriff must release the claimed property back to the debtor and charge the costs of the levy to the creditor instead.
Rule 69 also gives the creditor a powerful investigative tool: full access to the discovery procedures used elsewhere in these rules, so the creditor (or a successor who holds an interest of record) can question the debtor or third parties about assets that might satisfy the judgment. This discovery right applies whether the creditor is pursuing execution itself or a related proceeding meant to aid the judgment's enforcement. Rule 69 applies in the district courts as well as the circuit courts.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Rule 69 let a judgment creditor do?
It lets a judgment creditor apply for a writ of execution to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy a money judgment, and it gives the creditor discovery tools to locate assets in aid of collecting that judgment.
How does a judgment debtor protect property from being sold under a writ of execution?
The debtor may file a notarized claim of exemption with the sheriff before any sale takes place, which stops the sale of the claimed property unless the creditor successfully contests the claim.
What happens if the creditor does not contest a debtor’s exemption claim in time?
The sheriff must release the exempt property back to the debtor and the costs of making the levy and holding the property are charged to the creditor instead.
How is a debtor notified that property is being seized under Rule 69?
The sheriff personally delivers the writ of execution and the exemption notice to the debtor when possible, and otherwise serves them by first-class mail to the debtor’s last known address or by posting on the debtor’s residence.
Can a judgment creditor use discovery to find a debtor’s assets?
Yes. Rule 69 allows the creditor, or a successor who holds a recorded interest in the judgment, to use the same discovery procedures available in ordinary litigation to investigate the debtor’s property and finances.
Does Rule 69 apply in Alabama’s district courts?
Yes, Rule 69 applies in the district courts in the same manner as in the circuit courts.