Rule 56.Summary Judgment
Current through January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 56
Amendment History
The current West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure took effect January 1, 2025, as part of a rewrite that modernized the rules’ numbering and structure. West Virginia does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own January 1, 2025 update; for the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West Virginia Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Not every case needs a trial to decide it. Rule 56 lets a party ask the court to rule as a matter of law, on a whole claim or defense or just part of one, whenever the record shows no genuine dispute over a fact that matters to the outcome. Absent a different deadline the court sets, a party can move for summary judgment any time up to 30 days after discovery closes.
Getting there takes real work from both sides. A party asserting that a fact is or isn't in dispute has to point to specific parts of the record — depositions, documents, affidavits, admissions, interrogatory answers — or show that the cited materials don't settle the question, or that the other side can't produce admissible evidence to support it. A party can object that cited material couldn't be presented in admissible form at trial, and the court generally only has to consider material the parties cite, though it can look further if it wants. If a party doesn't properly support or dispute a fact, the court can give it another chance, treat the fact as undisputed, grant summary judgment based on what's undisputed, or issue some other order.
If the nonmoving party can't yet marshal the facts it needs to oppose the motion, an affidavit or declaration explaining why lets the court defer or deny the motion, allow more time or discovery, or fashion another appropriate order. And the court isn't limited to what the parties ask for: after notice and a chance to respond, it can grant summary judgment for the party that didn't move for it, grant it on grounds nobody raised, or take up summary judgment on its own once it flags the facts it thinks aren't in dispute.
Even a motion that doesn't dispose of the whole case can still narrow it — the court can identify undisputed facts (including how much of the damages aren't contested) and treat them as established going forward. And a court that finds an affidavit or declaration was submitted in bad faith or just to cause delay can order the submitting party to cover the other side's resulting expenses, including attorney fees, on top of contempt or other sanctions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has to be true for a court to grant summary judgment?
The movant has to show there's no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it's entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
How long do I have to file a motion for summary judgment?
Absent a different court-ordered deadline, any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery.
What happens if I need more time or discovery to respond to a summary judgment motion?
File an affidavit or declaration explaining why you can't yet present the facts needed to oppose it, and the court can defer or deny the motion, allow more time for discovery, or issue another appropriate order.
Can a court grant summary judgment for a party that didn't even ask for it?
Yes, after giving notice and a reasonable time to respond, the court can grant summary judgment for a nonmovant or on grounds no party raised.