Rule 48.Juries; verdict; polling
Current through January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 48
Amendment History
The current West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure took effect January 1, 2025, as part of a rewrite that modernized the rules’ numbering and structure. West Virginia does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own January 1, 2025 update; for the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West Virginia Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 48 leaves a few of the jury's core features open to party agreement. The standard six-person jury can shrink if the parties stipulate to a smaller number, and the standard requirement of a unanimous verdict can loosen if the parties stipulate to something less.
After the jury returns its verdict but before it's discharged, any party can demand the jurors be polled individually — and the court can order polling on its own even without a request. If that poll reveals the jurors weren't unanimous, or didn't reach whatever level of agreement the parties stipulated to, the court doesn't just accept the verdict as given: it can send the jury back to deliberate further, or order a new trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the parties agree to a jury smaller than six people?
Yes. Rule 48(a) lets the parties stipulate to any number fewer than six.
Does a jury verdict have to be unanimous?
Yes, unless the parties stipulate otherwise.
What is jury polling, and when can I request it?
After the verdict is returned but before the jury is discharged, any party can request the jurors be polled individually to confirm each one agrees with the verdict; the court can also do this on its own.
What happens if a poll shows the jury wasn't unanimous?
The court can direct the jury to keep deliberating, or order a new trial.