Rule 65.Injunctions
Group 8: Provisional and Final Remedies · Last amended September 19, 2023 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65
Amendment History
Adopted May 5, 1967, effective July 1, 1967; amended, adopted April 9, 1974, effective July 1, 1974; amended, adopted Dec. 2, 1980, effective Jan. 1, 1981; amended, adopted June 12, 1989, effective Sept. 1, 1989; amended, effective April 28, 2015; amended September 7, 2023, effective September 19, 2023.
Plain-English Summary
When someone needs a court to stop conduct right now, before a full hearing can happen, Rule 65 supplies the framework. It separates two tools that get used together but aren't the same thing: the temporary restraining order, meant for an emergency that can't wait for notice to the other side, and the preliminary injunction, meant to hold the situation steady while the case proceeds toward trial.
A preliminary injunction always requires notice to the adverse party — Rule 65(a)(1) is direct about that. A TRO is the narrow exception, and the rule keeps it narrow on purpose. To get one without notifying the other side, the applicant needs specific facts, shown by affidavit or a verified complaint, establishing that immediate and irreparable injury will happen before the adverse party could be heard, plus the applicant's attorney must certify in writing what efforts were made to give notice and why notice shouldn't be required. Once issued, a no-notice TRO must carry the date and hour of issuance, get filed and entered of record right away, state the injury and why it's irreparable, explain why no notice was given, and expire on its own terms within a period the court sets that cannot exceed 14 days — though the court can extend it once for a like period on good cause, or longer if the restrained party agrees. The rule also forces the case to keep moving: the preliminary injunction motion has to be set for the earliest possible hearing, ahead of most other matters, and if the applicant doesn't pursue it the court dissolves the TRO. The restrained party isn't left waiting, either — on 2 days' notice, or less if the court allows it, they can move to dissolve or modify the order before that hearing ever arrives.
Security backs up both kinds of orders. Rule 65(c) requires the applicant to post security in whatever amount the court finds proper, to cover costs and damages if it turns out the restrained party was wrongfully enjoined — with exceptions carved out for the United States and its officers or agencies, for a recognized Indian tribe within Washington and its officers or agencies, and, under RCW 4.92.080, for the State of Washington and its municipal corporations and political subdivisions. Rule 65.1 then governs how a surety on that security gets held to account.
Whatever order finally issues has to do real work on paper. Rule 65(d) requires the order to state its reasons, be specific in its terms, and describe the restrained act or acts in reasonable detail rather than by pointing back to the complaint. It binds the parties, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, plus anyone else acting in concert with them who gets actual notice. And under Rule 65(e), these procedures supplement rather than override any statute that creates a right to injunctive relief — except that where the rule and a statute conflict on procedure, the rule controls.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do I need to show to get a TRO without notifying the other side?
Specific facts, established by affidavit or a verified complaint, showing immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will occur before the adverse party can be heard in opposition, plus a written certification from the applicant's attorney describing the efforts made to give notice and the reasons notice shouldn't be required.
How long can a no-notice TRO last?
It expires by its own terms within whatever period the court fixes, not to exceed 14 days, unless the court extends it once for a like period on good cause shown, or the restrained party consents to a longer extension. The reasons for any extension must be entered of record.
Can I get a preliminary injunction without telling the other side?
No. Rule 65(a)(1) states plainly that no preliminary injunction may issue without notice to the adverse party. Only a TRO can issue without notice, and only on the showing described above.
Is a bond required to get a TRO or preliminary injunction in Washington?
Generally yes. Rule 65(c) requires the applicant to give security in an amount the court sets, unless a statute provides otherwise or the party is exempt — the United States and its officers or agencies, a recognized Indian tribe in Washington and its officers or agencies, or, under RCW 4.92.080, the State of Washington and its municipal corporations and political subdivisions.
What happens after a court grants a TRO without notice?
The motion for a preliminary injunction must be set down for the earliest possible hearing, taking precedence over other matters except older matters of the same kind. If the party who obtained the TRO doesn't proceed with that motion, the court dissolves the TRO.
Can the restrained party fight back before the scheduled hearing?
Yes. On 2 days' notice to the party who obtained the TRO — or on shorter notice the court allows — the adverse party may appear and move to dissolve or modify it, and the court must hear that motion as quickly as the interests of justice require.
What must an injunction or restraining order say?
Under Rule 65(d), it must state the reasons for its issuance, be specific in its terms, and describe the restrained act or acts in reasonable detail — not by pointing back to the complaint or another document. It binds only the parties, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and anyone in active concert with them who receives actual notice.