Rule 1.Scope of rules
Group 1: Introductory · Last amended July 9, 2024 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1
Amendment History
Adopted May 5, 1967, effective July 1, 1967; amended June 2, 2005, effective Sept. 1, 2005; amended June 7, 2024, effective July 9, 2024.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 1 is the mission statement for Washington’s civil procedure system. It tells courts and litigants that every rule that follows exists to serve one purpose: resolving civil lawsuits filed in superior court in a way that is just, speedy, and inexpensive. Those three words work as an interpretive lens — when a procedural question is not clearly answered elsewhere, courts read the rules through this lens rather than defaulting to technicality for its own sake.
The rule covers “suits of a civil nature,” a phrase broad enough to reach both traditional actions at law and cases that once would have gone to a court of equity. Rule 2 folds those historical categories into a single “civil action,” and Rule 1 makes clear the same procedural rules apply no matter which side of that old line a case would once have fallen on. The one carve-out comes from Rule 81, which lists proceedings — certain special statutory proceedings, for instance — where these rules do not fully apply or apply only by analogy.
A 2024 amendment added a sentence permitting proceedings to be held by remote means. That addition responded to courts’ experience conducting hearings, and sometimes trials, by video when in-person appearance was not always practical. The rule does not spell out which proceedings may be remote or how; it establishes that remote participation is permitted, leaving the mechanics to local practice and the rules that govern each type of proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rule 1 apply to every case filed in Washington superior court?
It applies to suits of a civil nature, whether they once would have been actions at law or suits in equity, with the exceptions listed in Rule 81 for certain special proceedings.
What does "just, speedy, and inexpensive" mean in practice?
It is the standard courts use to construe and apply the other civil rules — favoring outcomes that resolve disputes on the merits without unnecessary delay or cost over rigid, technical readings of procedure.
Can a hearing or trial happen remotely under Rule 1?
Yes. Rule 1 states that proceedings held by remote means are permitted. It does not itself specify the procedure for requesting or conducting a remote proceeding — that is left to the court and the rules governing the specific proceeding.
Does Rule 1 create any deadlines or rights of its own?
No. It is a statement of purpose and scope. Specific deadlines, filing requirements, and rights come from the rules that follow.
Why does the rule mention "cases at law or in equity"?
That phrase reflects the historical distinction between legal and equitable proceedings. Rule 2 merges them into a single civil action, and Rule 1 confirms the same procedural rules govern both.