Rule 71.Process in behalf of and against persons not parties
Part VIII: Provisional and Final Remedies and Special Proceedings · Last amended April 1, 2006 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 71
Amendment History
Renumbered from 71A and amended effective April 1, 2006.
Plain-English Summary
Court orders sometimes reach beyond the named parties. A person who is not a party to a lawsuit may still be the one an order is written to protect, and Rule 71 lets that person enforce the order using the same enforcement tools a party would use — no need to intervene in the case or file a separate action first. The reverse is also true: if an order can lawfully be enforced against someone who is not a party, that person faces the same enforcement process a party would face for disobeying it.
The rule works as a bridge, extending the enforcement machinery found elsewhere in these rules — things like contempt, writs of attachment, and writs of execution — to people who never formally joined the case but are nonetheless the intended beneficiary or target of a particular order.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can someone who isn't a party to a lawsuit enforce a court order?
Yes, if the order was made in that person's favor. Rule 71 lets a non-party enforce obedience to such an order using the same process a party would use.
Can a non-party be forced to comply with a court order?
Yes. If an order can lawfully be enforced against a person who isn't a party — for example, someone holding property covered by the order — that person is subject to the same enforcement process as a party would face.
Does a non-party have to formally join the case to use Rule 71?
No. The rule lets a non-party who benefits from an order enforce it directly, without first becoming a party to the underlying action.