RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 34.Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes

Part V: Depositions and Discovery · Last amended May 1, 2017 · Last verified July 13, 2026

In one sentenceRule 34 lets a party demand that another party produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things for inspection, or allow entry onto property to inspect or test it, and sets a 28-day deadline for a specific written response.

Full Text of Rule 34

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Scope.
(1) Any party may serve on any other party a request to produce and permit the requesting party to inspect, copy, test or sample any designated discoverable documents, electronically stored information or tangible things (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent into reasonably usable form) in the possession or control of the responding party.
(2) Any party may serve on any other party a request to permit entry upon designated property in the possession or control of the responding party for the purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated discoverable object or operation on the property.
(b) Procedure and limitations.
(1) The request must identify the items to be inspected by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request must specify a reasonable date, time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts. The request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.
(2) The responding party must serve a written response within 28 days after service of the request. The responding party must restate each request before responding to it. The response must state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related acts will be permitted as requested, or that the request is objected to. If the party objects to a request, the party must state the reasons for the objection with specificity. Any reason not stated is waived unless excused by the court for good cause. An objection must state by individual item or by category whether any responsive items are being withheld on the basis of that objection. An objection that states the terms that have controlled a search for responsive items qualifies as a statement that items outside of the search terms may have been withheld. The party must identify and permit inspection of items responsive to any part of a request that is not objectionable. If the party objects to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information — or if no form was specified in the request — the responding party must state the form or forms it intends to use.
(c) Form of documents and electronically stored information.
(1) A party who produces documents for inspection must produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or must organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request.
(2) If a request does not specify the form or forms for producing electronically stored information, a responding party must produce the information in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a form or forms that are reasonably usable.
(3) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

Amendment History

Amended effective November 1, 1999; November 1, 2007; November 1, 2011; May 1, 2017.

Advisory Committee Notes

The 2017 amendments to paragraph (b)(2) adopt 1) the specificity requirement in the 2015 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b)(2)(B), 2) a portion of Federal Rule 34(b)(2)(C) dealing with the basis for an objection to production, and 3) some clarifying language from the federal note.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 34 covers two related discovery tools. Under section (a)(1), any party can ask another party to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling — a broad category that reaches writings, drawings, photographs, sound recordings, and any other data stored in a form that can be translated into something usable. Section (a)(2) covers a different kind of request: asking to enter property the responding party possesses or controls, to inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property itself or something on it.

A request under Rule 34 has to identify what's being sought, either item by item or by category, with enough particularity that the responding party knows exactly what's being asked for, and it has to specify a reasonable date, time, place, and manner for the inspection. A request can also specify the form electronically stored information should take. The responding party then has 28 days to serve a written response, restating each request before answering it. For each item or category, the response has to say either that inspection will be permitted as requested, or that the party objects — and an objection has to state its reasons with specificity. Skip a reason and it's waived unless the court excuses the omission for good cause. An objection also has to say whether any responsive items are being withheld on that basis; if the objection describes the search terms used, that description itself signals that items outside those terms may have been withheld. Whatever part of a request isn't objectionable still has to be answered and produced. If the responding party objects to the requested format for electronically stored information, or no format was specified at all, the response has to state what format the party intends to use.

Section (c) governs how the documents themselves come out. A party producing documents has to produce them as they're kept in the ordinary course of business, or organize and label them to match the categories in the request. If a request doesn't specify a format for electronically stored information, the responding party has to produce it in the form it's ordinarily kept in, or in a form that's reasonably usable — and nobody has to produce the same electronically stored information in more than one format.

A 2017 amendment tightened the objection requirements in section (b)(2), adding the specificity requirement, the obligation to say whether responsive items are being withheld, and the rule that a description of search terms counts as notice that other items may have been left out.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can I ask for in a Utah Rule 34 request for production?

Documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things in the other party's possession or control, for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling.

Can I use Rule 34 to inspect someone's property, not just their documents?

Yes. Section (a)(2) lets a party ask to enter property the responding party possesses or controls to inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample it or something on it.

How long does the other party have to respond to a request for production in Utah?

28 days after service of the request. The responding party must restate each request before responding to it.

What has to be in an objection to a Rule 34 request?

The specific reasons for the objection, and a statement of whether any responsive items are being withheld on that basis. Any reason not stated is waived unless the court excuses the omission for good cause.

Can the other side withhold documents without telling me?

Not silently. An objection must state whether responsive items are being withheld on the basis of that objection, and describing the search terms used qualifies as notice that items outside those terms may have been withheld.

Can I specify the format for electronic documents in my request?

Yes. A request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.

What happens if my request doesn't specify a format for electronic documents?

The responding party must produce the information in the form it's ordinarily maintained in, or in a form that's reasonably usable.

Do I have to produce the same electronic file in more than one format?

No. A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

Source & verification. Rule text, Advisory Committee Notes, and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Utah Supreme Court. Last verified July 13, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: request for production utahRFPdocument requests utahutah rule 34inspecting property in a lawsuit utahelectronically stored information discovery utahobjecting to document requests utah