Rule 18.Joinder of claims and remedies
Part IV: Parties · Last amended November 1, 2024 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 18
Amendment History
Amended effective November 1, 2024.
Plain-English Summary
Once two parties are already in a lawsuit together, Rule 18 removes the need to file separate cases for separate claims. A plaintiff, or a defendant asserting a counterclaim, can join as many legal or equitable claims against the opposing party as they have, whether the claims are related to each other or not, and whether they are pressed as independent claims or as alternatives to one another. When more than two parties are involved, that same freedom to combine claims applies as long as the joinder rules for adding parties, claims against co-parties, and interpleader are also satisfied, and the same goes for crossclaims and third-party claims that meet their own joinder requirements.
The rule also frees up the order in which claims get resolved. A party does not have to win a judgment on one claim before adding a second claim that only makes sense once the first one succeeds — both can be joined in a single case, with the court sorting out what relief each side is entitled to. The rule gives a concrete example: a plaintiff can ask for a money judgment and, in the same case, ask the court to set aside a transaction the defendant used to dodge paying debts, without first nailing down the money judgment in a separate lawsuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do my claims against the same defendant have to be related to join them in one lawsuit?
No. Rule 18 lets a plaintiff join any claims, legal or equitable, against an opposing party in a single case regardless of whether they arise from the same events. That is different from Rule 20's permissive-joinder rule for adding parties, which does require a connection to the same transaction or occurrence.
Can I combine a counterclaim with other claims against the plaintiff?
Yes. A defendant who asserts a counterclaim can join it with any other legal or equitable claims against the plaintiff, the same way a plaintiff can combine claims in the complaint.
Can I ask the court for money and also ask it to undo a fraudulent transfer in the same case?
Yes. Rule 18(b) specifically allows a plaintiff to combine a claim for money with a claim to set aside a voidable transaction, without first getting a judgment on the money claim in a separate case.