Rule 71.Process in Behalf of and Against Persons Not Parties.
Current through February 2024 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 71
Amendment History
Rhode Island does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own February 2024 printing; for the underlying adopting orders and any later amendments, see the Rhode Island Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 71 makes clear that a court order can reach beyond the named parties in a case. If an order is entered in favor of someone who isn’t formally a party — someone with no claim or defense on file — that person can enforce the order using the same procedures a party would use.
The same rule works in reverse. If an order can lawfully be enforced against someone who isn’t a party, that person is subject to the same enforcement process — execution, contempt, or whatever else the court would use against a party — as if they had been a party all along.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can someone who isn't a party to a lawsuit still enforce a court order?
Yes, if the order was made in that person’s favor. Rule 71 lets a non-party use the same enforcement tools — such as execution or contempt proceedings — that a party would use to enforce the same order.
Can a court order bind someone who was never named as a party?
Yes, when the order can lawfully be enforced against that person. Rule 71 treats a bound non-party the same as a party for purposes of enforcement, so the usual enforcement process applies to them too.
What does it mean to be treated 'as if a party' under Rule 71?
It means the non-party gets neither extra protection nor extra difficulty in enforcing, or being subject to, the order. The same procedural tools available against or in favor of a named party — execution, contempt, and the like — apply equally to the non-party.