Rule 64.Replevin.
Current through February 2024 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 64
Amendment History
Rhode Island does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own February 2024 printing; for the underlying adopting orders and any later amendments, see the Rhode Island Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Replevin is the tool for someone who says their personal property is being wrongfully held or was wrongfully taken. Rather than waiting until the end of a lawsuit to get the property back, a plaintiff files a complaint and summons and, within that same action, moves for a writ of replevin that can transfer possession while the case is still pending.
The court will not grant that motion lightly. It has to find both a probability that judgment will ultimately favor the plaintiff and a substantial need to transfer possession before the case is resolved. Instead of ordering the goods handed over, the court can order the defendant to post security guaranteeing any judgment that follows, and any surety on that security gets the same protections as a surety under Rule 65(c). Notably, a replevin motion can never be granted ex parte — the other side always gets notice and a chance to respond.
The same process is open to a defendant who is bringing a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint over the same kind of property, provided the goods sit in the county where the case is pending. And the writ itself is not limited to the start of the case; it can be issued later in the litigation, or used as a way of executing a judgment already won.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is replevin?
Replevin is a way to recover possession of personal property — goods and chattels — that someone else wrongfully took or is wrongfully holding. It works through a lawsuit combined with a writ that can transfer possession while the case is still going on.
Can I get my property back immediately without telling the other side?
No. Rule 64(a) specifically says a motion for a writ of replevin shall not be granted ex parte. The other party always gets notice and an opportunity to be heard before possession changes hands.
What if I am the defendant and I am the one claiming the property?
Rule 64(b) lets a party bring replevin through a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint using the same procedure as an original claim, as long as the goods are located in the county where the action is pending.