Rule 47.Jurors.
Current through February 2024 · Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 47
Amendment History
Rhode Island does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own February 2024 printing; for the underlying adopting orders and any later amendments, see the Rhode Island Judiciary’s compiled rules page.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 47 governs how prospective jurors get questioned and how a court can add insurance against losing jurors partway through a trial.
On examination, the court decides who asks the questions. It may let the parties or their attorneys question prospective jurors directly, or conduct the examination itself. If the court handles the questioning, it still must let the parties or their attorneys follow up with further questions it considers proper, or ask the prospective jurors additional questions the parties or attorneys submit. Either way, the examination is done under oath if a party requests it.
Rule 47 also lets the court seat one or two alternate jurors alongside the regular panel, as provided by law, so the case isn’t derailed if a juror can’t continue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who questions prospective jurors — the judge or the lawyers?
The court decides. It may let the parties or their attorneys conduct the examination directly, or conduct it itself while still allowing the parties or their attorneys to ask further proper questions, or to submit additional questions for the court to ask.
Is jury questioning done under oath?
Yes, if a party requests it. Rule 47 requires the examination of prospective jurors to be conducted under oath upon request.
Can extra jurors be seated in case one drops out during trial?
Yes. The court may direct that one or two alternate jurors be called and impanelled alongside the regular panel, as provided by law.