RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 44.Proof of Official Record.

Current through February 2024 · Last verified July 8, 2026

In one sentenceRule 44 spells out how to prove that an official record, or an entry in one, is authentic using a certified or attested copy, and how to prove that no such record exists, without needing the original document or the custodian's live testimony.

Full Text of Rule 44

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Authentication of Copy. An official record or an entry therein, when admissible for any purpose, may be evidenced by an official publication thereof or by a copy attested by the officer having the legal custody of the record, or by the officer's deputy. If the office in which the record is kept is outside of this state but within the United States or within a territory or insular possession subject to the dominion of the United States, a certificate that such officer has the custody of the record shall be made by a judge of a court of record of the district or political subdivision in which the record is kept, authenticated by the seal of the court, or may be made by any public officer having official duties in the district or political subdivision in which the record is kept, authenticated by the seal of the officer's office. If the office in which the record is kept is in a foreign state or country, such certificate may be made by a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent or by any officer in the foreign service of the United States stationed in the foreign state or country in which the record is kept, and authenticated by the seal of the officer's office.
(b) Proof of Lack of Record. A written statement signed by an officer having the custody of an official record or by the officer's deputy that after diligent search no record or an exact copy of a record is found to exist in the records of that office is admissible as evidence that the records of that office contain no such record or entry, provided that if the record is kept without the state, the statement shall be accompanied by a certificate as required by subdivision (a) of this rule.
(c) Other Proof. This rule does not prevent the proof of official records or of entry or lack of entry therein by any method authorized by any applicable statute or by any other method authorized by law.

Amendment History

Rhode Island does not publish a per-rule amendment history inside the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own February 2024 printing; for the underlying adopting orders and any later amendments, see the Rhode Island Judiciary’s compiled rules page.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 44 lets a party prove that an official record says what it says without dragging the record-keeper into court or producing a fragile original. Instead of live testimony, a certified or attested copy — or an official published version — stands in for the record itself.

The certification chain depends on where the record lives. If it’s kept in Rhode Island or elsewhere in the United States, a copy attested by the officer who has legal custody of it, or that officer’s deputy, is enough. If the record sits outside Rhode Island but still within the United States or a U.S. territory or insular possession, a judge of a court of record in that district or political subdivision must certify, under the court’s seal, that the officer really does have custody — or a public officer with duties there can certify it under the seal of that officer’s own office. If the record is kept in a foreign country, the certifying officer must be a diplomatic or consular official stationed there — a secretary of embassy or legation, a consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent, or another officer in the foreign service of the United States stationed there — with that officer’s seal attached.

Rule 44 also covers the opposite situation: proving that a record does not exist. A written statement from the custodian, or deputy, saying that a diligent search turned up no matching record is admissible to show the office contains no such record or entry. If the office is outside Rhode Island, that statement needs the same certificate the rule requires for authenticating a copy.

None of this forecloses other ways to prove an official record. Rule 44 offers a convenient path, not the exclusive one — a party may still prove a record, an entry, or the lack of one through any other method a statute or other law allows.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to bring the original official record to court?

No. Rule 44 lets you use an official publication of the record or a copy attested by the officer who has legal custody of it, or that officer’s deputy, instead of the original.

How do I prove a record kept in another country?

You need a copy certified by a diplomatic or consular officer stationed there — a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, consular agent, or another U.S. foreign service officer — with that officer’s seal attached.

What if the office has no record of what I’m looking for?

A written statement from the custodian, or deputy, confirming that a diligent search found no such record is admissible to prove the office holds none. If the office is outside Rhode Island, that statement must carry the same certification the rule requires for a copy.

Source & verification. The rule text is reproduced verbatim from the official Rhode Island Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure (R.I. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 44). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island (R.I. Gen. Laws § 8-6-2). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 8, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: proving official records in courtcertified copy of a public recordhow to authenticate a government documentproof of no record on fileself-authenticating official records rulecertified copy ruleofficial record evidence rule