Rule 78.Order or Judgment for Specific Acts
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 78
Amendment History
[CCP 12/13/80; 1985 c.610 § 1; § C amended by CCP 12/13/86; § B amended by 1991 c.724 § 31 ; § D repealed by 1991 c.724 § 32 ; § C(2) amended by 1993 c.33 § 365 11/4/93; § C amended by 1995 c.608 § 41 9/9/95; § C amended by 2003 c.14 § 14 eff. 1/1/04; § C amended by 2007 c.71 § 4 , eff. 1/1/08; § C amended by 2021 c.97, § 3 , eff. 1/1/22 and by c.597, § 76, eff. 9/25/21]
Plain-English Summary
Rule 78 addresses judgments that order a party to do something rather than pay money — transfer property, sign a release, or perform some other specific act. If the court sets a deadline for that act and the party doesn’t comply, the judgment itself stands in for the act: the conveyance or release is treated as done even though the party never carried it out. Beyond that legal fiction, the court can also enforce the order by holding the noncompliant party in contempt under Oregon’s contempt statutes.
The contempt option doesn’t reach orders to pay money, with one family-law exception: it’s available for spousal or child support, maintenance, education, or attorney-fee obligations ordered in a divorce, annulment, or separation case, or in support proceedings under the state’s support-order statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
If a party refuses to sign a transfer or release the judgment orders, does the transfer still happen?
Yes. A judgment requiring a party to make a conveyance, transfer, release, or similar act within a specified period is treated as accomplishing that act if the party doesn’t comply, even without the party’s signature or cooperation.
Can someone be held in contempt for refusing to comply with a court order to perform an act?
Yes. The court can enforce an order or judgment directing a party to perform a specific act by punishing a party who refuses or neglects to comply as for contempt.
Can a party be held in contempt for failing to pay a money judgment?
Generally no — the contempt remedy in this rule doesn’t reach orders to pay money. The one exception is family-law obligations: support, maintenance, education, and attorney-fee awards ordered in a divorce, annulment, or separation case, or in related support proceedings, can still be enforced through contempt.
Does this rule cover judgments requiring someone to hand over property?
It covers judgments requiring a conveyance, transfer, release, acquittance, or similar act — the kind of order that transfers rights or interests through a document or formal step, rather than an order to pay money.