Rule 5.Jurisdiction (In Rem)
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 5
Amendment History
[CCP 12/2/78]
Plain-English Summary
Some lawsuits are not about compelling a particular person to do or pay something — they are about determining rights in a piece of property or a legal status. Rule 5 gives Oregon courts a separate kind of authority for those cases: jurisdiction “in rem,” meaning jurisdiction over the property or status itself rather than personal jurisdiction over a defendant under Rule 4. That authority still depends on proper notice — a judgment in rem can affect a defendant’s interest in the property or status at issue only if the defendant has been served with summons under Rule 7 or another applicable rule or statute.
Rule 5 recognizes two situations. Section A covers actions where the property itself — real or personal, located in Oregon — is the subject of the case, and a defendant has or claims a lien or interest in it, or the plaintiff is asking to exclude the defendant from an interest or lien in it. This section reaches even an unknown defendant, which matters in disputes over title where every possible claimant needs to be bound by the result. Section B covers actions to foreclose, redeem from, or satisfy a mortgage, claim, or lien on Oregon real property — the kind of case a lender or lienholder brings to enforce rights against a specific parcel rather than to collect a personal debt from a specific person.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does “jurisdiction in rem” mean under Rule 5?
It means the court’s authority runs to a piece of property or a legal status located in Oregon, rather than to a specific person the way personal jurisdiction under Rule 4 does. A judgment in an in rem case resolves rights in that property or status, binding whoever has an interest in it.
Does a defendant still need to be served if the case is about property rather than about them personally?
Yes. Rule 5 says a judgment in rem can affect a defendant’s interest in the property, status, or thing at issue only if a summons has been served on the defendant under Rule 7 or another applicable rule or statute.
Can Rule 5 apply when the owner of a competing interest in the property is unknown?
Yes. Section A specifically applies even when a defendant claiming a lien or interest in the property is unknown, which lets a court resolve competing claims to property, such as in a title dispute, without first having to identify every possible claimant by name.
What kind of case falls under Rule 5, section B?
Section B covers actions to foreclose, redeem from, or satisfy a mortgage, claim, or lien on real property in Oregon — the kind of case a lender or lienholder brings to enforce rights against a specific parcel of property rather than to collect a personal debt from a specific person.