Rule 41.Effect of Errors and Irregularities in Depositions
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 41
Amendment History
[CCP 12/2/78]
Plain-English Summary
Depositions generate plenty of small procedural problems: a notice that falls short of Rule 39’s requirements, an officer who turns out to be disqualified, a leading question, a transcript that isn’t certified correctly. Rule 41 decides which of those problems a party can still raise later and which are gone for good if nobody objected at the time. As a general pattern, problems that could have been fixed on the spot, such as a defective notice, a disqualified officer, a poorly formed question, or an improper oath, must be raised promptly, either before the deposition, at the deposition, or as soon as the problem is discovered; staying silent waives the objection. Objections to written questions served under Rule 40 follow their own clock, due within the time allowed for the next round of questions and, at the latest, twenty days after the final questions are served.
Two categories get more forgiving treatment. Objections to a witness’s competency, or to whether testimony is competent, relevant, or material, survive even if nobody objected at the deposition, unless raising the point at the time could have fixed the problem. And errors in how the deposition was transcribed, signed, certified, or filed only need to be raised through a motion to suppress made promptly after the defect is discovered, or after it should have been discovered with reasonable diligence — there’s no requirement to catch these problems during the deposition itself, since many of them can’t be seen until the transcript exists.
Frequently Asked Questions
I think the deposition notice I received didn’t follow the rules. What should I do?
Serve a prompt written objection on the party who gave the notice. If you don’t, any errors or irregularities in the notice are waived.
The officer who swore in the witness may have been disqualified. Does that ruin the deposition?
Only if nobody objects. The objection must be made before the deposition begins, or as soon afterward as the disqualification becomes known or reasonably should have been discovered. Otherwise, it’s waived.
Do I have to object to every improper question during the deposition itself?
For errors that could have been fixed on the spot, such as the form of a question or answer, a problem with the oath, or improper conduct, yes: staying quiet at the deposition waives the objection. Objections to a witness’s competency, or to whether testimony is competent, relevant, or material, are treated more leniently and survive even without a contemporaneous objection, unless raising the point at the deposition could have fixed the problem.
What if I don’t discover a problem with how the deposition was transcribed or certified until later?
File a motion to suppress the deposition, in whole or in part, promptly after you discover the defect, or after you should have discovered it with reasonable diligence. There’s no requirement to have caught these problems during the deposition itself.
How do objections to written deposition questions under Rule 40 work?
They must be served in writing within the time allowed for serving the next round of questions, and no later than 20 days after the last authorized round of questions is served.