Rule 3.Commencement
Current through June 1, 2026 · Last verified July 11, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3
Amendment History
[CCP 12/2/78]
Plain-English Summary
Rule 3 answers a basic question with a short rule: an Oregon civil action begins the moment a complaint is filed with the clerk of the court. Filing is what commences the case — a plaintiff does not also have to serve the defendant before the action counts as pending.
The rule carves out one exception in its opening clause: for purposes of a statute of limitations, something other than the filing date can control when an action counts as commenced. Rule 3 does not spell out what that something is — it flags only that limitations deadlines follow their own rule, so a plaintiff racing a deadline should not assume that filing alone stops the clock.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does serving the defendant start an Oregon lawsuit, or does filing the complaint?
Filing does. Rule 3 says an action is commenced by filing a complaint with the clerk of the court. Serving the defendant is a separate, later step governed by other rules, not a requirement for the case to count as commenced.
Does filing a complaint always stop a statute of limitations from running?
Not necessarily. Rule 3 states its filing rule applies “other than for purposes of statutes of limitations,” which means a different standard, not spelled out in this rule, controls when a case counts as commenced for limitations purposes. A plaintiff racing a deadline should not assume that filing alone is enough.
Why does Rule 3 mention statutes of limitations without explaining them?
Rule 3 exists to state one general principle clearly: filing commences an action. Its limitations carve-out flags only that a different, more specific rule governs when a case counts as commenced for deadline purposes, so it avoids duplicating or conflicting with that separate standard here.