RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 41.Dismissal of Actions

Last amended July 1, 2001 · Last verified July 1, 2026

In one sentenceRule 41 lets a plaintiff dismiss a case once without a court order before trial starts, but requires court approval for any dismissal after that or when a defendant's counterclaim would otherwise be cut off, and treats most involuntary dismissals as decisions on the merits unless the court says otherwise.

Full Text of Rule 41

Text sizeJump to: (A) (B) (C) (D)

A Voluntary dismissal: effect thereof
1 By plaintiff; by stipulation
Subject to the provisions of Civ.R. 23(E), Civ.R. 23.1, and Civ.R. 66, a plaintiff, without order of court, may dismiss all claims asserted by that plaintiff against a defendant by doing either of the following:
a Filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the commencement of trial unless a counterclaim which cannot remain pending for independent adjudication by the court has been served by that defendant;
b Filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action.
Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits of any claim that the plaintiff has once dismissed in any court.
2 By order of court
Except as provided in division (A)(1) of this rule, a claim shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff's instance except upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon that defendant of the plaintiff's motion to dismiss, a claim shall not be dismissed against the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under division (A)(2) of this rule is without prejudice.
B Involuntary dismissal: effect thereof
1 Failure to prosecute
Where the plaintiff fails to prosecute, or comply with these rules or any court order, the court upon motion of a defendant or on its own motion may, after notice to the plaintiff's counsel, dismiss an action or claim.
2 Dismissal; non-jury action
After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant, without waiving the right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. If the court renders judgment on the merits against the plaintiff, the court shall make findings as provided in Civ.R. 52 if requested to do so by any party.
3 Adjudication on the merits; exception
A dismissal under division (B) of this rule and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, except as provided in division (B)(4) of this rule, operates as an adjudication upon the merits unless the court, in its order for dismissal, otherwise specifies.
4 Failure other than on the merits
A dismissal for either of the following reasons shall operate as a failure otherwise than on the merits:
a Lack of jurisdiction over the person or the subject matter;
b Failure to join a party under Civ.R. 19 or Civ.R. 19.1.
C Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim
The provisions of this rule apply to the dismissal of any counterclaim, cross-claim, or third- party claim. A voluntary dismissal by the claimant alone pursuant to division (A)(1) of this rule shall be made before the commencement of trial.
D Costs of previously dismissed action
If a plaintiff who has once dismissed a claim in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the claim previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order.

Amendment History

Effective Date: July 1, 1970

Amended: July 1, 1971; July 1, 1972; July 1, 2001

Staff Note (July 1, 2001 Amendment)

Civil Rule 41 Dismissal of Actions

This rule was amended (1) to reflect more precisely its interpretation by the Supreme Court in Denham v. City of New Carlisle, 86 Ohio St. 3d 594 (1999); (2) to conform Civ.R. 41(D) with Civ.R. 41(A) as amended; and (3) to reflect that Civ.R. 23.1 provides that a shareholder derivative action “shall not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court.” In divisions (B) and (C), masculine references were changed to gender-neutral language, the style used for rule references was changed, and other grammatical changes were made. No substantive amendment to divisions (B) and (C) was intended.

Plain-English Summary

Division (A) gives a plaintiff two ways to dismiss all claims against a defendant without needing the court's permission: filing a notice of dismissal any time before trial begins, unless the defendant has already served a counterclaim that cannot be independently adjudicated, or filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by every party who has appeared in the case. Unless the notice or stipulation says otherwise, that kind of dismissal is without prejudice -- except that a plaintiff who has already dismissed the same claim once before in any court triggers the "two-dismissal rule," under which a second notice of dismissal operates as a final adjudication on the merits. Once those options aren't available -- because trial has begun, or the plaintiff has already used up the one free dismissal -- a claim can be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on whatever terms the court finds proper, and if a defendant has already pleaded a counterclaim, the court can't dismiss the plaintiff's claim over the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can stand on its own.

Division (B) covers dismissals the court imposes rather than the plaintiff requests. A court may dismiss an action or claim, on a defendant's motion or its own initiative, after giving the plaintiff's counsel notice, when the plaintiff fails to prosecute the case or comply with the rules or a court order. In a case tried without a jury, once the plaintiff finishes presenting evidence, the defendant may move to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff has shown no right to relief on the facts and the law, without giving up the right to present its own evidence if the motion is denied; the court can rule immediately or wait until all the evidence is in, and must make findings under Rule 52 if a party asks. A dismissal under division (B), or any dismissal the rule doesn't otherwise address, counts as a decision on the merits unless the court's order says otherwise -- except that dismissal for lack of jurisdiction over the person or subject matter, or for failing to join a required party under Rule 19 or 19.1, is always treated as a dismissal other than on the merits.

Division (C) extends every part of this rule to dismissing a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, with a voluntary dismissal by the claimant alone still limited to before trial begins. Division (D) lets a court impose costs, and stay a new action until they're paid, when a plaintiff who has already dismissed a claim once files a new action based on the same claim against the same defendant.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many times can a plaintiff dismiss a case without the court's permission?

Once, by filing a notice of dismissal before trial begins or a stipulation signed by every party. Dismissing the same claim a second time by notice operates as a final adjudication on the merits under the two-dismissal rule.

Can a plaintiff dismiss a case if the defendant has already filed a counterclaim?

Only if the counterclaim can still be independently adjudicated by the court. If it can't stand on its own, the plaintiff needs a court order to dismiss, and the court can't grant that dismissal over the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim remains viable.

Does an involuntary dismissal count as a loss on the merits?

Usually, yes, unless the court's dismissal order specifies otherwise. The exceptions are dismissals for lack of jurisdiction over the person or subject matter, or for failing to join a required party, which are always treated as failures other than on the merits.

Source & verification. The rule text, Effective Date, Amended dates, and Staff Notes are reproduced verbatim from the official Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure (Ohio R. Civ. P. 41). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Ohio (Ohio Constitution, Art. IV, § 5(B)). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 1, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: voluntary dismissalinvoluntary dismissaltwo-dismissal ruledismissal without prejudice