Rule 52.Findings by the Court
Last amended July 1, 2015 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 52
Amendment History
Effective Date: July 1, 1970
Amended: July 1, 1971; July 1, 1989; July 1, 2015
Staff Note (July 1, 2015 Amendment)
The rule is amended to (1) replace “conclusions of fact” with “findings of fact” in the first paragraph of the rule and (2) include a reference to the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Civ.R. 23(G)(3).
Plain-English Summary
When questions of fact are tried by the court without a jury, judgment may be general for the prevailing party unless a party requests otherwise in writing, either before the entry of judgment or within seven days after the party has been given notice of the court's announcement of its decision, whichever comes later. Once that request is timely made, the court must state its findings of fact separately from its conclusions of law, either as part of the judgment or in a separate document. An opinion or memorandum of decision filed before judgment that already contains separately stated findings and conclusions satisfies this requirement without any further filing. When a party requests findings, the court may, in its discretion, require any or all of the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, though only what the court itself adopts becomes part of the record. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not required for rulings on other motions, including those under Rules 12, 55, and 56.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a party get the court to explain its factual findings after a bench trial?
By requesting findings of fact and conclusions of law in writing, either before judgment is entered or within seven days after the party is notified of the court's decision, whichever is later.
Does a written opinion count as findings of fact and conclusions of law?
Yes, if it's filed before the judgment entry and separately states the findings of fact and conclusions of law, it satisfies Rule 52 without any additional filing.
Are findings of fact required when the court rules on a motion rather than after a full trial?
No. Rule 52 doesn't require findings of fact and conclusions of law for rulings on other motions, including motions under Rules 12, 55, and 56.