RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 23.1.Derivative Actions by Shareholders

Last amended July 1, 1970 · Last verified July 1, 2026

In one sentenceRule 23.1 lets a shareholder sue on behalf of a corporation to enforce a right the corporation itself has failed to pursue, but only if the complaint is verified, shows the shareholder's standing and efforts to get the corporation to act, and any dismissal or settlement is approved by the court after notice to other shareholders.

Full Text of Rule 23.1

Text size

In a derivative action brought by one or more legal or equitable owners of shares to enforce a right of a corporation, the corporation having failed to enforce a right which may properly be asserted by it, the complaint shall be verified and shall allege that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains or that his share thereafter devolved on him by operation of law. The complaint shall also allege with particularity the efforts, if any, made by the plaintiff to obtain the action he desires from the directors and, if necessary, from the shareholders and the reasons for his failure to obtain the action or for not making the effort. The derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the shareholders similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation. The action shall not be dismissed or compromised without the approval of the court, and notice of the proposed dismissal or compromise shall be given to shareholders in such manner as the court directs.

Amendment History

Effective Date: July 1, 1970

Plain-English Summary

A derivative action lets a shareholder step into the corporation’s shoes to pursue a right the corporation could assert but has not. Because the shareholder is suing on behalf of the corporation rather than in an individual capacity, Rule 23.1 imposes safeguards beyond ordinary pleading requirements.

The complaint must be verified, and it must allege that the plaintiff was a shareholder at the time of the transaction being challenged, or that the shares later came to the plaintiff by operation of law — a requirement meant to keep someone from buying into a corporation solely to manufacture a lawsuit over past conduct. The complaint must also describe with particularity what efforts, if any, the plaintiff made to get the corporation’s directors, and if necessary its shareholders, to pursue the claim directly, and explain why those efforts failed or were not made.

The action cannot go forward if the plaintiff does not adequately represent the interests of similarly situated shareholders. And because the litigation and its outcome affect shareholders who are not before the court, the case cannot be dismissed or compromised without court approval, and shareholders must be given notice of a proposed dismissal or compromise in whatever manner the court directs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can bring a derivative action under Rule 23.1?

One or more shareholders who owned shares at the time of the transaction they are challenging, or who received their shares afterward by operation of law, and who can adequately represent similarly situated shareholders.

Does a shareholder have to ask the corporation to sue before filing a derivative action?

The complaint must describe with particularity what demand, if any, the plaintiff made on the directors and shareholders to pursue the claim, and explain why that demand failed or was not made.

Can a shareholder derivative action be settled privately between the plaintiff and the corporation?

No. Rule 23.1 requires court approval of any dismissal or compromise, along with notice to shareholders in whatever manner the court directs, because the outcome affects shareholders who are not parties to the case.

Source & verification. The rule text, Effective Date, Amended dates, and Staff Notes are reproduced verbatim from the official Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure (Ohio R. Civ. P. 23.1). Prescribed by the Supreme Court of Ohio (Ohio Constitution, Art. IV, § 5(B)). The plain-English summary is original and written by us. Last verified July 1, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: shareholder derivative suitdemand futilityderivative action