Rule 4:46-6.Attorneys fees
Last amended September 1, 1994 · Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 7, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4:46-6
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “History” note beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; the “R.R.” citations refer to the former Revised Rules numbering the current rules replaced.
Adopted July 22, 1983 to be effective September 12, 1983; amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994.
Plain-English Summary
Losing a summary judgment motion, then winning at trial anyway, can carry a consequence for the other side. If the party who eventually prevails at trial had earlier moved for summary judgment or partial summary judgment and lost, the trial court may award that party counsel fees — but only if the denial turned on a factual contention the opposing party raised in bad faith, knowing it was a palpable sham or built on facts it knew or should have known were false.
The fee request goes to the trial judge, decided on the record from both the summary judgment motion and the trial itself, and the award reaches only the legal work spent on that motion and whatever additional work its denial made necessary.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party recover fees for a summary judgment motion it lost but should have won?
Yes, if that party ultimately prevails at trial and the court finds the denial was based on a factual contention the opposing party raised in bad faith, knowing it was a sham or false.
What legal work does a fee award under this rule cover?
Only the work on the summary judgment motion itself and any additional services the denial made necessary.