Rule 4:17-6.Limitation of interrogatories
Last amended September 1, 1994 · Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 7, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4:17-6
Amendment History
New Jersey publishes each rule’s amendment record in a “History” note beneath the rule. It is reproduced verbatim below; the “R.R.” citations refer to the former Revised Rules numbering the current rules replaced.
Source-R.R. 4:23-11. Amended and first sentence deleted (see R. 4:10-4) July 14, 1972 to be effective September 5, 1972; amended July 13, 1994 to be effective September 1, 1994.
Plain-English Summary
Outside the uniform-interrogatory cases, New Jersey does not cap the number of interrogatories. This rule provides that the number of interrogatories, or of sets of them, is not limited except as required to protect a party from annoyance, expense, embarrassment, or oppression.
The safety valve is the protective order. A party to whom interrogatories are propounded may apply for one under Rule 4:10-3 if the volume or nature of the questions crosses into harassment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a limit on the number of interrogatories in New Jersey?
Outside the uniform-interrogatory cases, no fixed limit applies, except as needed to protect a party from annoyance, expense, embarrassment, or oppression. A party may seek a protective order under Rule 4:10-3.