Rule 2.228.Transfer to the Court of Claims
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.228
Amendment History
Michigan tracks the orders that adopt and amend its Court Rules in a separate administrative record rather than printing a history note beneath each rule in the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the full order-by-order history of this rule, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
A notice of transfer to the Court of Claims is due before or at the time the defendant files an answer, matching the deadline for an ordinary venue motion. Once that window closes, what happens next depends on the court's own jurisdiction. If the court where the case is pending shares concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of Claims, the defendant needs the court's leave to transfer late, which the court can grant only if the facts behind the request weren't, and reasonably couldn't have been, known more than 14 days before it was filed. If the original court has no jurisdiction at all because the case falls within the Court of Claims's exclusive jurisdiction, the transfer instead proceeds under the rule governing transfers for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Frequently Asked Questions
When do I have to ask to transfer my case to the Court of Claims?
Before or at the same time you file your answer.
What if I miss that deadline?
If the court where the case is pending shares jurisdiction with the Court of Claims, you need the court's leave, which requires showing the facts supporting the request weren't, and reasonably couldn't have been, known more than 14 days earlier.
What if the original court never had jurisdiction at all?
Then the rule governing transfers for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction controls instead of this rule's leave requirement.