Rule 2.207.Misjoinder and Nonjoinder of Parties
Current through May 1, 2026 · Last verified July 6, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2.207
Amendment History
Michigan tracks the orders that adopt and amend its Court Rules in a separate administrative record rather than printing a history note beneath each rule in the compiled rules text reproduced here. The text above is verified current through the source’s own May 1, 2026 update; for the full order-by-order history of this rule, see the Michigan Supreme Court’s rules and orders page.
Plain-English Summary
Misjoinder of parties is not grounds for dismissing an action. Parties can be added or dropped by court order, whether a party asks for it by motion or the court raises it on its own initiative, at any point in the case and on terms the court finds just. When resolving a counterclaim or cross-claim requires bringing in someone beyond the original parties, the court orders that person brought in as a defendant if it can get jurisdiction over them. A claim against a party can also be severed and pursued on its own.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does suing the wrong party or forgetting someone doom my case?
No. Rule 2.207 says misjoinder isn't grounds for dismissing an action; the court can add or drop parties instead.
Who can ask the court to add or remove a party?
Any party can move for it, or the court can act on its own initiative, at any point in the case.
What if resolving a counterclaim or cross-claim requires someone not yet in the case?
The court orders that person brought in as a defendant if it can obtain jurisdiction over them.