Rule 116.Dismissal of Actions
Last verified July 8, 2026
Full Text of Rule 116
Advisory Committee’s Notes & Reporter’s Notes
Advisory Notes — June 2008
Rule 116 incorporates Rule 41 relating to dismissals with a special provision under the Family Division Rules. That provision allows filing of another action to address similar issues subject to appropriate counterclaims and defenses following the dismissal of a prior action that is not a final judgment on the merits. Thus, when a divorce action is filed but dismissed without a final judgment, that dismissal does not preclude a subsequent divorce action from being filed, heard, and decided on the merits. The same non-preclusive effect of a dismissal would apply to other Family Division actions unless the court, in entering the dismissal, specially indicated that the dismissal was with prejudice, precluding further litigation of the same issues.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 41 governs dismissals of Family Division actions, with one change: every dismissal is without prejudice unless the court specifically says the dismissal is with prejudice and bars further litigation of the same issue. A party may file a new action addressing issues like those in a dismissed case, subject to the counterclaims and defenses that would ordinarily apply.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are Family Division dismissals in Maine with or without prejudice?
Without prejudice by default; a dismissal is with prejudice only if the court specifically says so.
Can a new case be filed after a Family Division dismissal on similar issues?
Yes, subject to whatever counterclaims and defenses would ordinarily apply to that new action.