Rule 3-645.1.Garnishment of account in financial institution
District Court · Last amended May 1, 2011 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3-645.1
Amendment History
Added April 21, 2011, effective May 1, 2011.
Committee Note & Source
Committee note. Federal regulations found in 31 C.F.R. Part 212 contain requirements, prohibitions, and limitations applicable to the garnishment of accounts of a judgment debtor in a financial institution which prevail over any inconsistent State law. Relevant terms are defined in 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 including “account,” “account review,” “financial institution,” and “protected amount.” This Rule is intended to comply with the Federal requirements.
Source. This Rule is new.
Plain-English Summary
Federal law shields certain benefit payments — Social Security among them — from garnishment once they land in a bank account, and Rule 3-645.1 builds that protection into Maryland's garnishment procedure. It borrows its key terms, including "account," "account review," "financial institution," and "protected amount," directly from 31 C.F.R. § 212.3, and it applies whenever a garnished account is subject to that federal regulation. Rule 3-645 still governs the garnishment itself, but where the two conflict, this rule wins, and any federal requirement not already covered by Rule 3-645 applies on top of it.
The writ served on the financial institution has to reflect that framework. Unless a federal Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits is attached, the writ must direct the institution not to hold a protected amount, not to hold protected funds that arrive after service, and to otherwise follow 31 C.F.R. Part 212. It also has to tell the debtor that some federal benefits may be automatically shielded and won't be held at all, and that a claim of exemption for anything not automatically protected has to be filed within 30 days of service on the garnishee. When the garnishee answers, it only has to say whether a protected amount sits in the account — not how much — though it still must specify any non-protected amount it's holding as of the account review date. If everything in the account turns out to be protected, the garnishee asks, along with its answer, for judgment ending the garnishment.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a "protected amount" and why does it matter?
It's a term defined by 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 for benefit funds — such as certain federal payments — that federal law shields from garnishment once they're deposited. A financial-institution garnishee has to identify whether an account holds a protected amount, and if the whole account is protected, it doesn't have to hold any of it.
Does this rule replace Rule 3-645?
No. Rule 3-645 still applies to the garnishment. This rule adds federal requirements on top of it and controls only where the two would otherwise conflict.
Does the garnishee have to disclose the exact protected amount?
No. The answer only has to state that a protected amount exists in the account, not its dollar figure. The garnishee still has to specify any non-protected amount it holds as of the account review date.
How does a debtor claim an exemption for money that isn't automatically protected?
The writ has to notify the debtor that a claim of exemption for a non-protected amount must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the writ is served on the garnishee.
What happens if the entire account turns out to be protected?
The garnishee includes, along with its answer, a request for judgment in its own favor that terminates the garnishment.