RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 3-645.1.Garnishment of account in financial institution

District Court · Last amended May 1, 2011 · Last verified July 13, 2026

In one sentenceRule 3-645.1 layers federal protections for benefit payments like Social Security onto a garnishment of a bank or financial-institution account, so the garnishee knows what it can't touch.

Full Text of Rule 3-645.1

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

(a) Definitions. — The definitions in 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 apply to terms used in this Rule.
(b) Scope. — This Rule applies to the garnishment of an account that is subject to the requirements, prohibitions, and limitations of 31 C.F.R. § 212.
(c) Application of Rule 3-645. — Rule 3-645 applies to a garnishment subject to this Rule, except that this Rule prevails over Rule 3-645 to the extent of any inconsistency and the requirements, prohibitions, and limitations not contained in Rule 3-645 also apply.
(d) Content of Writ. —
(1) Directions to financial institution. — Unless a Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits that conforms with 31 C.F.R. § 212.4 and Appendix B to 31 C.F.R. Part 212 is attached, a writ of garnishment subject to this Rule shall direct the financial institution:
(A) not to hold property of the judgment debtor that constitutes a protected amount;
(B) not to hold property of the judgment debtor that may come into the garnishee’s possession following service of the writ if the account contains a protected amount; and
(C) to comply with other applicable requirements, prohibitions, and limitations contained in 31 C.F.R. Part 212.
(2) Notification to Judgment Debtor. — A writ of garnishment subject to this Rule shall notify the judgment debtor that:
(A) some Federal benefit payments may be automatically protected from garnishment and will not be held in response to the writ of garnishment; and
(B) any claim for exemption for a non-protected amount must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after service of the writ of garnishment on the garnishee.
(e) Answer of Garnishee. —
(1) The answer of the garnishee shall state, if applicable, that a protected amount is in the judgment debtor’s account but need not specify the amount. Committee note. — Subsection (e)(1) does not affect the requirement that the garnishee hold, subject to further proceedings, a non-protected amount that is in the garnishee’s possession on the date of the account review and specify that amount in its answer.
(2) If the answer of the garnishee states that the property held by the garnishee consists only of a protected amount, the garnishee shall include with the answer a request for a judgment in favor of the garnishee terminating the garnishment.

Amendment History

Added April 21, 2011, effective May 1, 2011.

Committee Note & Source

Committee note. Federal regulations found in 31 C.F.R. Part 212 contain requirements, prohibitions, and limitations applicable to the garnishment of accounts of a judgment debtor in a financial institution which prevail over any inconsistent State law. Relevant terms are defined in 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 including “account,” “account review,” “financial institution,” and “protected amount.” This Rule is intended to comply with the Federal requirements.

Source. This Rule is new.

Plain-English Summary

Federal law shields certain benefit payments — Social Security among them — from garnishment once they land in a bank account, and Rule 3-645.1 builds that protection into Maryland's garnishment procedure. It borrows its key terms, including "account," "account review," "financial institution," and "protected amount," directly from 31 C.F.R. § 212.3, and it applies whenever a garnished account is subject to that federal regulation. Rule 3-645 still governs the garnishment itself, but where the two conflict, this rule wins, and any federal requirement not already covered by Rule 3-645 applies on top of it.

The writ served on the financial institution has to reflect that framework. Unless a federal Notice of Right to Garnish Federal Benefits is attached, the writ must direct the institution not to hold a protected amount, not to hold protected funds that arrive after service, and to otherwise follow 31 C.F.R. Part 212. It also has to tell the debtor that some federal benefits may be automatically shielded and won't be held at all, and that a claim of exemption for anything not automatically protected has to be filed within 30 days of service on the garnishee. When the garnishee answers, it only has to say whether a protected amount sits in the account — not how much — though it still must specify any non-protected amount it's holding as of the account review date. If everything in the account turns out to be protected, the garnishee asks, along with its answer, for judgment ending the garnishment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a "protected amount" and why does it matter?

It's a term defined by 31 C.F.R. § 212.3 for benefit funds — such as certain federal payments — that federal law shields from garnishment once they're deposited. A financial-institution garnishee has to identify whether an account holds a protected amount, and if the whole account is protected, it doesn't have to hold any of it.

Does this rule replace Rule 3-645?

No. Rule 3-645 still applies to the garnishment. This rule adds federal requirements on top of it and controls only where the two would otherwise conflict.

Does the garnishee have to disclose the exact protected amount?

No. The answer only has to state that a protected amount exists in the account, not its dollar figure. The garnishee still has to specify any non-protected amount it holds as of the account review date.

How does a debtor claim an exemption for money that isn't automatically protected?

The writ has to notify the debtor that a claim of exemption for a non-protected amount must be filed with the court no later than 30 days after the writ is served on the garnishee.

What happens if the entire account turns out to be protected?

The garnishee includes, along with its answer, a request for judgment in its own favor that terminates the garnishment.

Source & verification. Rule text, Committee Note, Source note, and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Maryland Rules, adopted by the Supreme Court of Maryland. Last verified July 13, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: garnish social security or federal benefits accountprotected amount bank account garnishment31 cfr 212 maryland garnishmentfinancial institution garnishee federal benefitsexempt bank funds from garnishment