Rule 3-615.Judgment on claim and counterclaim
District Court · Not amended since adoption on record · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 3-615
Committee Note & Source
Source. This Rule is derived from former Rule 605 b.
Plain-English Summary
District Court cases sometimes end with money going both ways: the plaintiff wins on the original claim, and the defendant wins on a counterclaim. Rule 3-615 keeps that outcome from turning into two separate judgments. Instead of entering one judgment for the plaintiff and another for the defendant, the court compares the two dollar amounts and enters a single judgment for whichever side came out ahead, in the amount of the difference.
Say a plaintiff recovers $3,000 on the claim and the defendant recovers $1,200 on the counterclaim. Under this rule, the court enters one judgment for $1,800 in the plaintiff's favor rather than a $3,000 judgment and a competing $1,200 judgment. That keeps the docket clean, avoids two collectible judgments running against each other, and spares both sides the trouble of enforcing, or defending against, offsetting debts.
The rule reaches only money damages. If a claim or counterclaim seeks something other than money, that award stands on its own and isn't part of the netting calculation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the claim and counterclaim awards are for the same amount?
Neither side has an excess over the other, so there is no dollar amount left for the court to enter a money judgment on under this rule.
Does this offset apply to non-money awards, like return of property?
No. Rule 3-615 applies only to money damages. Non-monetary relief awarded on a claim or counterclaim is entered separately and isn't part of the offset.
Who ends up as the judgment creditor after the offset?
Whichever party's award was larger becomes the judgment creditor, and the judgment runs against the other party for the excess amount.