RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 2-703.Attorneys’ fees allowed by law

Circuit Court · Last amended April 1, 2023 · Last verified July 13, 2026

In one sentenceRule 2-703 lays out the pleading deadline, scheduling-conference choices, and twelve-factor lodestar test Maryland circuit courts use to decide attorneys’-fee claims allowed by statute or other law.

Full Text of Rule 2-703

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

(a) Scope of Rule. — This Rule applies to claims for attorneys’ fees allowable by law to a party in an action in a circuit court.
(b) Pleading. — A party who seeks attorneys’ fees from another party pursuant to this Rule shall include a claim for such fees in the party’s initial pleading or, if the grounds for such a claim arise after the initial pleading is filed, in an amended pleading filed promptly after the grounds for the claim arose.
(c) Scheduling conference and order. — Unless the court orders otherwise, if a claim for attorneys’ fees is made pursuant to this Rule, the court shall conduct a scheduling conference and, as part of a scheduling order entered pursuant to Rule 2-504 shall:
(1) determine whether to require enhanced documentation, quarterly statements, or other procedures permitted by section (d) of this Rule;
(2) determine whether evidence regarding the party’s entitlement to attorneys’ fees or the amount thereof may practicably be submitted during the parties’ cases-in-chief with respect to the underlying cause of action or should await a verdict by the jury or finding by the court with respect to that underlying cause of action; and
(3) in light of the determination made under subsection (c)(2), determine whether, pursuant to section (f) of this Rule, any award of attorneys’ fees will be included in the judgment entered on the underlying cause of action or as a separate judgment.
(d) Enhanced procedures and requirements for certain cases. — Upon a determination by the court that the case is likely to result in a substantial claim for attorneys’ fees for services over a significant period of time, the court may:
(1) require parties seeking an award (A) to keep time records in a specific manner, and (B) to provide to parties against whom an award is sought quarterly statements showing the total amount of time all attorneys, paralegals, and other professionals have spent on the case during the quarter and the total value of that time;
(2) determine whether, and to what extent, the Guidelines Regarding Compensable and Non- Compensable Attorneys’ Fees and Related Expenses contained in an Appendix to this Chapter shall be applied; and
(3) establish procedures and time schedules for the presentation of evidence and argument on issues relating to a party’s entitlement to an award and the amount thereof.
(e) Evidence. — Evidence in support of or in opposition to an award shall focus on the standards set forth in subsection (f)(3) of this Rule.
(f) Determination of award. —
(1) If No Award Permitted. — If, under applicable law, the verdict of a jury or the findings of the court on the underlying cause of action do not permit an award of attorneys’ fees, the court shall include in its judgment entered on the underlying cause of action the denial of such an award.
(2) If Award Permitted or Required. — If, under applicable law, the verdict of the jury or the findings of the court on the underlying cause of action permit but do not require an award of attorneys’ fees, the court shall determine whether an award should be made. If the court determines that a permitted award should be made or that under applicable law an award is required, the court shall apply the standards set forth in subsection (f)(3) of this Rule and determine the amount of the award.
(3) Factors to be Considered. — In making its determinations under subsection (f)(2) of this Rule, the court shall consider, with respect to the claims for which fee-shifting is permissible:
(A) the time and labor required;
(B) the novelty and difficulty of the questions;
(C) the skill required to perform the legal service properly;
(D) whether acceptance of the case precluded other employment by the attorney;
(E) the customary fee for similar legal services;
(F) whether the fee is fixed or contingent;
(G) any time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances;
(H) the amount involved and the results obtained;
(I) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys;
(J) the undesirability of the case;
(K) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; and
(L) awards in similar cases.
(g) Judgment. — Except as provided in subsection (f)(1) of this Rule, the grant or denial of an award of attorneys’ fees may be included in the judgment on the underlying cause of action or in a separate judgment, as directed by the court. The court shall state on the record or in a memorandum filed in the record the basis for its grant or denial of an award.

Amendment History

Added effective January 1, 2014; amended September 17, 2015, effective January 1, 2016; April 21, 2023, effective April 1, 2023.

Committee Note & Source

Committee note. This Rule applies predominantly to actions in which attorneys’ fees are allowed by statute. This Rule would also apply where attorneys’ fees may be awarded under common law or by a Rule, other than as set forth in Rule 2-702 (b).

Committee note. If the court intends to delay the presentation of evidence on the claim for attorneys fees until after a determination of the underlying cause of action, but desires to enter one judgment that would include the denial or grant of an award of attorneys’ fees, the jury’s verdict or court findings on the underlying cause of action should be docketed, but the court must assure that no judgment is entered on the verdict or findings until the claim for attorneys’ fees is resolved.

Committee note. Where the claim for attorneys’ fees is based on law, rather than a contract, the determination of whether, in light of the verdict or findings on the underlying cause of action, an award must or should be made and, if so, the amount thereof is for the court. See Admiral Mortgage v. Cooper, 357 Md. 533, 550-53 (2000); 373 Md. 501, 519 (2003); 403 Md. 443, 457, n.12 (2008).

Committee note. The factors listed in subsection (f)(3) of this Rule have been approved by the Supreme Court in statutory fee-shifting cases, where the “lodestar method” is applied in determining an award. See Monmouth Meadows v. Hamilton, 416 Md. 325, 333-34 (2010). See Rule 2-705(f) for the factors to be applied in contractual fee-shifting actions.

Source. This Rule is new.

Plain-English Summary

This rule governs fee claims allowed by law — typically a fee-shifting statute, though it also reaches common-law and rule-based fee claims not already carved out under Rule 2-702(b). A party seeking fees under this rule must raise the claim in its initial pleading, or in an amended pleading filed promptly once the grounds for the claim arise. Once such a claim is on the table, the court holds a scheduling conference and, through its scheduling order, decides three things: whether to require enhanced documentation or quarterly billing statements, whether fee evidence should come in during the parties’ case-in-chief on the underlying claim or wait until after a verdict or finding, and whether any eventual fee award will be folded into the judgment on the underlying claim or entered as a separate judgment.

For cases likely to generate a substantial fee claim over a long stretch of litigation, the court can order enhanced procedures: specific time-keeping requirements, quarterly statements to the opposing side showing hours worked and their value, use of the chapter’s fee guidelines appendix, and a tailored schedule for presenting evidence and argument. When it comes time to decide the claim, a jury verdict or court finding that doesn’t permit a fee award ends the matter — the court denies the award in its judgment. If an award is permitted but not required, the court decides whether to make one; if permitted or required, the court applies twelve factors to set the amount: time and labor required, novelty and difficulty of the questions, skill required, whether taking the case precluded other work, the customary fee for similar work, whether the fee is fixed or contingent, any time limits imposed, the amount involved and results obtained, the attorney’s experience, reputation, and ability, the undesirability of the case, the length of the professional relationship with the client, and awards made in similar cases. Whatever the court decides, it must explain the basis for granting or denying the award on the record or in a written memorandum.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who decides a statutory attorneys’-fee claim — the judge or the jury?

The judge. Where a fee claim rests on law rather than a contract, deciding whether an award should be made and how much falls to the court, unlike the contract-damages claims covered by Rule 2-704.

What factors set the size of a statutory fee award?

The court weighs twelve factors under section (f)(3) — among them the time and labor required, the skill needed, the customary fee for similar work, the results obtained, and awards made in comparable cases. These are the factors Maryland courts apply under the lodestar method.

When must I raise a claim for fees allowed by law?

In the initial pleading. If the grounds for the claim arise later, the party must raise it in an amended pleading filed promptly after those grounds arise.

Can the court decide the fee claim after the trial on the underlying case is over?

Yes. The scheduling order can direct that fee evidence wait until after a verdict or finding on the underlying claim. In that situation, the verdict or finding should still be docketed, but no judgment should be entered on it until the fee claim is resolved, so both can be reflected in one judgment if the court chooses.

Source & verification. Rule text, Committee Note, Source note, and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Maryland Rules, adopted by the Supreme Court of Maryland. Last verified July 13, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Maryland lodestar factors attorneys feesstatutory fee shifting circuit court Marylandtwelve factors reasonable attorney fee Marylandattorneys fees allowed by law Maryland ruleMd Rule 2-703