Rule 2-703.Attorneys’ fees allowed by law
Circuit Court · Last amended April 1, 2023 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2-703
Amendment History
Added effective January 1, 2014; amended September 17, 2015, effective January 1, 2016; April 21, 2023, effective April 1, 2023.
Committee Note & Source
Committee note. This Rule applies predominantly to actions in which attorneys’ fees are allowed by statute. This Rule would also apply where attorneys’ fees may be awarded under common law or by a Rule, other than as set forth in Rule 2-702 (b).
Committee note. If the court intends to delay the presentation of evidence on the claim for attorneys fees until after a determination of the underlying cause of action, but desires to enter one judgment that would include the denial or grant of an award of attorneys’ fees, the jury’s verdict or court findings on the underlying cause of action should be docketed, but the court must assure that no judgment is entered on the verdict or findings until the claim for attorneys’ fees is resolved.
Committee note. Where the claim for attorneys’ fees is based on law, rather than a contract, the determination of whether, in light of the verdict or findings on the underlying cause of action, an award must or should be made and, if so, the amount thereof is for the court. See Admiral Mortgage v. Cooper, 357 Md. 533, 550-53 (2000); 373 Md. 501, 519 (2003); 403 Md. 443, 457, n.12 (2008).
Committee note. The factors listed in subsection (f)(3) of this Rule have been approved by the Supreme Court in statutory fee-shifting cases, where the “lodestar method” is applied in determining an award. See Monmouth Meadows v. Hamilton, 416 Md. 325, 333-34 (2010). See Rule 2-705(f) for the factors to be applied in contractual fee-shifting actions.
Source. This Rule is new.
Plain-English Summary
This rule governs fee claims allowed by law — typically a fee-shifting statute, though it also reaches common-law and rule-based fee claims not already carved out under Rule 2-702(b). A party seeking fees under this rule must raise the claim in its initial pleading, or in an amended pleading filed promptly once the grounds for the claim arise. Once such a claim is on the table, the court holds a scheduling conference and, through its scheduling order, decides three things: whether to require enhanced documentation or quarterly billing statements, whether fee evidence should come in during the parties’ case-in-chief on the underlying claim or wait until after a verdict or finding, and whether any eventual fee award will be folded into the judgment on the underlying claim or entered as a separate judgment.
For cases likely to generate a substantial fee claim over a long stretch of litigation, the court can order enhanced procedures: specific time-keeping requirements, quarterly statements to the opposing side showing hours worked and their value, use of the chapter’s fee guidelines appendix, and a tailored schedule for presenting evidence and argument. When it comes time to decide the claim, a jury verdict or court finding that doesn’t permit a fee award ends the matter — the court denies the award in its judgment. If an award is permitted but not required, the court decides whether to make one; if permitted or required, the court applies twelve factors to set the amount: time and labor required, novelty and difficulty of the questions, skill required, whether taking the case precluded other work, the customary fee for similar work, whether the fee is fixed or contingent, any time limits imposed, the amount involved and results obtained, the attorney’s experience, reputation, and ability, the undesirability of the case, the length of the professional relationship with the client, and awards made in similar cases. Whatever the court decides, it must explain the basis for granting or denying the award on the record or in a written memorandum.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who decides a statutory attorneys’-fee claim — the judge or the jury?
The judge. Where a fee claim rests on law rather than a contract, deciding whether an award should be made and how much falls to the court, unlike the contract-damages claims covered by Rule 2-704.
What factors set the size of a statutory fee award?
The court weighs twelve factors under section (f)(3) — among them the time and labor required, the skill needed, the customary fee for similar work, the results obtained, and awards made in comparable cases. These are the factors Maryland courts apply under the lodestar method.
When must I raise a claim for fees allowed by law?
In the initial pleading. If the grounds for the claim arise later, the party must raise it in an amended pleading filed promptly after those grounds arise.
Can the court decide the fee claim after the trial on the underlying case is over?
Yes. The scheduling order can direct that fee evidence wait until after a verdict or finding on the underlying claim. In that situation, the verdict or finding should still be docketed, but no judgment should be entered on it until the fee claim is resolved, so both can be reflected in one judgment if the court chooses.