Rule 2-522.Court decision — Jury verdict
Circuit Court · Last amended January 1, 2014 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2-522
Amendment History
Added Nov. 1, 2001, effective Jan. 1, 2002; Nov. 12, 2003, effective Jan. 1, 2004; Dec. 4, 2007, effective Jan. 1, 2008; Nov. 21, 2013, effective Jan. 1, 2014.
Committee Note & Source
Source. This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) replaces former Rule 18 b from which it is in part derived.
Section (b) is in part new and in part derived from former Rules 560 and 759 a and e; from the 1937 version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 48 and from 1963 version of Fed. R. Civ. P. 49 (a).
Plain-English Summary
In a contested case tried without a jury, the judge has to put the reasoning on the record — filing or dictating a brief statement of why the court decided as it did and how it figured any damages — before or at the same time judgment is entered.
For jury trials, a verdict has to be unanimous unless the parties have stipulated that a stated majority will count as the verdict. The court can require the jury to answer specific written questions or make special findings instead of a general verdict, using whatever method of submission it thinks appropriate, and must instruct the jury on how to make those findings. If the court leaves out an issue that the pleadings or evidence raised, the parties lose their right to a jury trial on that issue unless someone demands it before the jury retires; an omitted issue left undemanded can be decided by the court, and if the court doesn't decide it, the finding is treated as consistent with the judgment that gets entered.
A verdict has to be returned in open court. If it's in the form of written findings, the judge reviews the verdict sheet before announcing the verdict or doing any harkening or polling, and if the written findings don't line up with the verdict as announced, the judge has to flag the inconsistency and get the parties' input on the record before moving forward. Any party can ask for the jury to be polled before it's discharged, and the court can do so on its own; if polling shows the jury (or the required majority) hasn't agreed, the court can send the jurors back to deliberate more or discharge them. To preserve an objection to the issues submitted, the instructions given, or a refusal to submit a requested issue, a party must object on the record before the jury retires, stating distinctly what's being objected to and why — and can ask to do so outside the jury's hearing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a judge have to explain a bench-trial ruling?
Yes. In a contested court trial, the judge must file or dictate into the record a brief statement of the reasons for the decision and the basis for any damages award, before or when judgment is entered.
Must a Maryland civil jury verdict be unanimous?
Yes, unless the parties stipulate that a verdict or finding of a stated majority will count as the jury's verdict.
What are written findings in a verdict?
Instead of a general verdict, the court can require the jury to answer specific written questions or make special findings on the issues, with instructions on how to complete them.
What happens if the court leaves an issue out of the jury's verdict form?
The parties waive their right to a jury trial on that issue unless a party demands its submission before the jury retires. If no one demands it, the court may decide the issue itself, or the finding is deemed consistent with the judgment entered.
What happens if jury polling shows the jury didn't agree?
The court can send the jury back for further deliberations or discharge it.
When must a party object to preserve an issue about the jury's instructions or verdict form?
Before the jury retires to deliberate, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds for the objection.