Rule 2-508.Continuance or postponement
Circuit Court · Last amended January 1, 2018 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 2-508
Amendment History
Amended Sept. 10, 2009, effective Oct. 1, 2009; June 20, 2017, effective August 1, 2017; October 10, 2017, effective January 1, 2018.
Committee Note & Source
Source. This Rule is derived as follows:
Section (a) is derived from former Rule 527 a 1.
Section (b) is derived from former Rule 526.
Section (c) is derived from former Rule 527 c 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Section (d) is derived from former Rule 527 e.
Plain-English Summary
Either on a party's motion or on its own, the court can continue or postpone a trial or other proceeding whenever justice calls for it. But an unfinished discovery schedule, by itself, isn't enough once a case has a trial date — the rule blocks that ground for continuance absent good cause. When the reason for the request is that a necessary witness can't be there, the moving party needs more than a bare request: an affidavit stating the intent to call that witness, the specific facts the witness would testify to, why the case can't be justly decided without that testimony, what diligence went into trying to get the witness there, and facts supporting the belief that the witness's attendance or testimony can still be obtained within a reasonable time. The court can question the affiant under oath about any of this.
If the court is satisfied the showing is sufficient, it must continue or postpone the proceeding — unless the opposing party heads that off by stipulating that the absent witness would testify exactly as the affidavit describes, in which case the court can deny the motion instead. Finally, when a court grants a continuance or postponement for a reason other than certain circuit-specific grounds, it can assess the costs and expenses the delay caused against a party.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a court postpone a trial without a motion from either side?
Yes. The court can continue or postpone a trial or other proceeding on its own initiative, not just on a party's motion, whenever justice requires it.
Is unfinished discovery a good enough reason to postpone a trial that's already scheduled?
Not by itself. Once a trial date is set, the rule bars using incomplete discovery as a ground for continuance unless the party shows good cause.
What must a party show to get a continuance because a witness can't attend?
A supporting affidavit stating the intent to call the witness, the specific facts the witness would testify to, why the case can't be justly decided without that testimony, the diligence used to secure the witness's attendance, and facts showing the witness's attendance or testimony can be obtained within a reasonable time.
Can the opposing party head off a continuance sought over an absent witness?
Yes. If the opposing party stipulates that the absent witness would testify to the facts stated in the affidavit, the court may deny the continuance instead of granting it.
Who pays for the costs a continuance causes?
The court has discretion to assess the costs and expenses caused by a continuance or postponement against a party, when the continuance is granted for a reason other than certain circuit-specific grounds.