Rule 98.Procedures for video recorded court proceedings and appeals.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 98
Amendment History
(Adopted July 12, 1989, effective August 28, 1989; amended August 6, 1990, effective September 15, 1990; amended July 8, 1992, effective August 1, 1992; amended September 7, 1994, effective October 1, 1994; amended December 3, 1998, effective January 1, 1999; amended November 27, 2000, effective February 1, 2001; amended October 1, 2002, effective January 1, 2003; amended November 13, 2006, effective January 1, 2007; amended October 25, 2022, effective January 1, 2023.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 98 governs court proceedings recorded on video instead of taken down word-for-word by a court reporter. It applies to any proceeding a judge records on video, and to any appeal from a judgment entered in one. Because the video recording becomes the official record, the rule spells out exactly how that record has to be made, marked, copied, and supplemented so it holds up on appeal.
Every proceeding gets recorded twice at the same time, either on two videotapes or as two copies of a digital recording, so there's a backup if one copy is lost or damaged. The clerk labels each recording with a code that identifies the court, the year, a sequential recording number, whether the clerk is keeping the original or has filed a duplicate, and the case number and party names, plus the date. Anyone who needs a copy for an appeal can get one from the clerk for a fee set by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
Because a video recording doesn't come with a transcript's page-and-line index, the rule requires paper trails alongside it. The trial judge keeps a written exhibit list, a trial log, and a log showing where each witness's testimony starts and stops on the recording, with a copy filed alongside the video. A judge may also order that exhibits be photographed for the record instead of held by the clerk, letting the original go back to the party who introduced it. Depositions played into evidence become part of the record either as a transcript or as the video itself, at the judge's discretion.
The rule also protects a party's right to have a stenographic reporter present even in a video-recorded proceeding. The court has to accommodate that reporter, including a seat inside the bar, so long as doing so doesn't disrupt the proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do video-recorded court proceedings work in Kentucky?
Under CR 98, the court records the proceeding twice at once, either on two videotapes or as two copies of a digital recording. The clerk labels each copy with a code identifying the court, year, recording number, and case, and keeps a written exhibit list, trial log, and witness-testimony log alongside the recording.
Can I get a copy of a video-recorded hearing for an appeal?
Yes. The clerk arranges duplicate copies of the video recording for use in preparing an appeal, for a reasonable fee set by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
Does a video recording replace a court reporter?
Not necessarily. A party may still have a stenographic reporter present in a video-recorded proceeding, and the court must accommodate that reporter, including inside the bar, so long as it doesn't unduly disrupt the proceeding.
How is a deposition handled in a video-recorded proceeding?
When a deposition is admitted into evidence in a proceeding using video recording equipment, the trial judge decides whether the official record consists of the deposition transcript or the video recording of the deposition itself.