Rule 56.03.Motion and proceedings thereon.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 56.03
Amendment History
The source reproduced here (current through June 18, 2026) records no amendment to this rule since its original adoption — no History line appears for it in the compiled rules. For the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West’s Rules & Procedures.
Plain-English Summary
This rule spells out the mechanics of a summary judgment motion once one is filed under 56.02. The moving party has to serve the motion at least 10 days before the hearing date, giving the opposing party time to respond. That opposing party can serve its own affidavits any time before the day of the hearing, laying out facts it says create a dispute.
The standard for granting the motion is set out directly: the court looks at the pleadings, depositions, interrogatory answers, stipulations, admissions on file, and any affidavits. If together they show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the court renders judgment. There is no room for the court to weigh disputed facts at this stage - if a genuine factual dispute exists, the motion fails.
The rule also allows a split outcome. Even when the parties dispute the amount of damages, the court can enter summary judgment on liability alone, leaving only the damages amount for trial. That judgment is interlocutory - not a final resolution of the whole case - but it narrows what is left to try.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much notice do I get before a summary judgment hearing in Kentucky?
Rule 56.03 requires the motion to be served at least 10 days before the time set for the hearing.
When do I have to file my opposing affidavits to a summary judgment motion?
Rule 56.03 lets the adverse party serve opposing affidavits any time before the day of the hearing.
Can a court grant summary judgment on liability but leave damages for trial?
Yes. Rule 56.03 allows an interlocutory summary judgment on liability alone even when there is a genuine issue about how much in damages is owed.