Rule 4.06.Warning order -- Affidavit.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4.06
Amendment History
(Amended November 21, 1977, effective January 1, 1978.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 4.06 controls the paperwork behind a warning order. The clerk cannot issue one on request alone — it takes an affidavit from the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney, or, if the plaintiff is under a disability, from whoever is suing on the plaintiff's behalf or that person's attorney. The affidavit has to state the ground for asking for constructive service under Rule 4.05, the defendant's last known address, or, for a corporation or association under Rule 4.05(b) whose own address is unknown, the last known address of someone who could be served on its behalf. Where the affiant does not know these facts, the affidavit says so instead.
If someone other than the plaintiff signs the affidavit, it must also explain that affiant's connection to the plaintiff and state the affiant's belief that the plaintiff does not know the missing facts. Once filed, an affidavit that the defendant does not controvert with a competing affidavit stands as sufficient evidence both for the warning order and for the underlying action.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has to swear out the affidavit for a warning order in Kentucky?
Rule 4.06 requires the affidavit from the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney, or, if the plaintiff is under a disability, from the person suing on the plaintiff's behalf or that person's attorney.
What must the affidavit for a warning order say?
It must state the ground for the warning order under Rule 4.05 and the defendant's last known address, or, if that address is unknown, the affiant's ignorance of it. If the affiant is not the plaintiff, the affidavit must also state the affiant's connection to the plaintiff and belief that the plaintiff does not know the missing facts.
Can a defendant challenge the affidavit behind a warning order?
Yes. Rule 4.06(2) makes the affidavit sufficient evidence supporting the warning order and the action only if it is not controverted by the defendant's own affidavit.