Rule 26.06.Effect of taking deposition or questioning deponent.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 26.06
Amendment History
The source reproduced here (current through June 18, 2026) records no amendment to this rule since its original adoption — no History line appears for it in the compiled rules. For the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West’s Rules & Procedures.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 26.06 keeps deposition testimony and trial admissibility on separate tracks. Asking a question at a deposition, or getting an answer to it, does not turn evidence that would otherwise be barred at trial into evidence a court will accept. A party can still raise the same objections to that testimony later that would have applied if the deposition had never happened.
The rule also protects against an implied waiver. Answering a deposition question, or not objecting during the deposition itself, does not give up the right to object to the testimony's use at trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
If I answer a question at a deposition in Kentucky, can it still be excluded from trial?
Yes. Rule 26.06 provides that taking a deposition does not make otherwise inadmissible evidence admissible, so objections to admissibility remain available even after the deposition testimony was given.
Does deposition testimony waive objections at trial in Kentucky?
No. Rule 26.06 states that questioning a deponent does not constitute a waiver of objections to the admissibility of that testimony.