Rule 21.Misjoinder and nonjoinder of parties.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 21
Amendment History
The source reproduced here (current through June 18, 2026) records no amendment to this rule since its original adoption — no History line appears for it in the compiled rules. For the underlying adopting order and any later amendments, see the West’s Rules & Procedures.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 21 protects a lawsuit from being thrown out because someone made a mistake about who should be a party. Misjoinder, meaning joining a person who should not have been included, does not doom the case. Neither does nonjoinder of parties who should have been included but were not.
Instead, the court can add or drop parties at any point in the litigation, on its own initiative or on a party's motion, on whatever terms are just under the circumstances. The court can also sever a claim against one party and let it proceed on its own, separate from the rest of the case, when that better serves the litigation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Kentucky lawsuit be dismissed for naming the wrong parties?
No. Rule 21 states that misjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissal. The remedy is adding or dropping parties, not throwing out the case.
Can a court add a party to a case after it's already been filed?
Yes. Rule 21 lets the court add or drop parties at any stage of the action, either on a party's motion or on the court's own initiative, on terms that are just.