Rule 12.07.Consolidation of defenses in motion.
Current through June 18, 2026 · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Rule 12.07
Amendment History
(Amended November 21, 1977, effective January 1, 1978.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 12.07 pushes parties to raise their procedural objections together instead of one at a time. A party who files a motion under Rule 12, say, to dismiss for improper venue, must fold in every other Rule 12 defense that is available at that point, such as insufficient service of process or lack of personal jurisdiction.
Leaving one out has a cost. A defense or objection that Rule 12 allowed to be raised by motion, but that was left out of the first motion, cannot be the basis of a second, separate motion later. The one exception is the set of defenses listed in Rule 12.08(2), which are not lost by omission and can still be raised in a pleading, by motion for judgment on the pleadings, or at trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if I leave a defense out of my Rule 12 motion?
A defense or objection available under Rule 12 that is omitted from the first Rule 12 motion cannot form the basis of a later, separate motion, unless it falls within the grounds preserved by Rule 12.08(2).
Do I have to combine all my Rule 12 defenses into one motion?
Yes. A party making a motion under Rule 12 must join it with the other Rule 12 motions available at the time, rather than filing them one after another.
Is failure to state a claim lost if I do not include it in my first motion?
No. Rule 12.08(2) specifically exempts failure to state a claim, along with two other grounds, from the consolidation requirement.