Rule 54.Judgment; Costs
Current through July 1, 2026 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 54
Amendment History
This rule’s current text took effect January 1, 1991. For the full history of earlier amendments and adoption orders, see the Indiana Office of Court Services.
Plain-English Summary
Trial Rule 54 opens by defining the word at the center of every civil case: a “judgment” is not only the document that ends a lawsuit outright — it includes a decree and any order a party can appeal, and it must contain everything Trial Rule 58 requires, without needing to recite the pleadings, a master’s report, or the history of the proceedings. Section B addresses a problem that comes up constantly in multi-claim or multi-party litigation: what happens when a court resolves one claim, or one party’s liability, while others remain pending? Ordinarily that partial ruling is not a final judgment at all — it stays open to revision until every claim and every party’s rights are resolved, and it cannot be appealed on its own. The one way around that rule is for the trial court to say, in writing, that there is no just reason to delay entry of judgment on the resolved piece, and to expressly direct that judgment be entered on it. Without both of those written statements, a decision touching less than the whole case is not final, no matter how it is labeled.
The remaining sections handle narrower but practical questions. Section C caps default judgments: a party who wins by default cannot recover more, in kind or amount, than what the complaint demanded, though a party who wins a contested case can be awarded relief beyond what the pleadings specifically asked for. Section D puts the everyday work of taxing costs in the clerk’s hands rather than the judge’s — the clerk computes and taxes costs on one day’s notice, and either side can ask the court to review that calculation by a motion filed within five days. Costs against a governmental entity are allowed only to the extent the law permits. Section E addresses judgments against more than one person, or resting on more than one claim: unless the judgment says otherwise, those judgments are joint and several, meaning a winning party can pursue enforcement against any one defendant or all of them, and any affected party can challenge the judgment — by appeal or motion — as to some parties or claims without every other party joining in.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a “judgment” under Trial Rule 54?
A judgment is not limited to the document that resolves an entire case. Trial Rule 54(A) defines it to include a decree and any order a party can appeal, and it must contain everything Trial Rule 58 requires — though it does not need to recite the pleadings, a master’s report, or the history of prior proceedings in the case.
When does a ruling on part of a multi-party or multi-claim case become final enough to appeal?
Only when the trial court says so in writing, twice over: it must expressly determine there is no just reason to delay entry of judgment on the resolved claim or party, and it must expressly direct that judgment be entered on it. Without both statements, the ruling stays open to revision and cannot be appealed on its own, no matter how the court labels it.
Can a party who wins by default recover more than the complaint asked for?
No. Trial Rule 54(C) caps a default judgment at the relief demanded — it cannot be different in kind or larger in amount than what the complaint sought. A party who wins a contested case, by contrast, can be awarded relief the pleadings never specifically requested.
Who decides how much a losing party owes in court costs?
The clerk handles routine cost calculations, computing and taxing costs on one day’s notice under Trial Rule 54(D). Either party can ask the court to review that calculation by filing a motion within five days after the clerk acts. Costs against a governmental organization are limited to what other law allows.
If a judgment is entered against two defendants, do I have to collect from both of them together?
No. Trial Rule 54(E) makes judgments against multiple parties, or resting on multiple claims, joint and several by default — you can pursue enforcement against one defendant, several, or all of them, separately or together, unless the judgment itself says otherwise.
Can one defendant appeal a joint judgment without the others joining in?
Yes. Trial Rule 54(E) lets any affected party challenge a judgment — by appeal, motion, or similar means — as to some parties or some claims without every other party participating, though it does not eliminate any separate notice requirements that apply to that challenge.