Rule 4.9.Summons: In rem actions
Current through July 1, 2026 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 4.9
Amendment History
This rule’s current text took effect January 1, 1970. For the full history of earlier amendments and adoption orders, see the Indiana Office of Court Services.
Plain-English Summary
An in rem action is a lawsuit centered on a specific piece of property or a legal status — a res — located within Indiana, rather than a claim seeking a personal money judgment against a particular defendant. Rule 4.9(A) applies whenever the action involves a res situated in Indiana, and it caps the court’s power at the extent of its jurisdiction over that res: the court can decide rights in the property or status even without the kind of personal jurisdiction over every claimant that a money judgment against them personally would require.
Section B lists three ways service can be made in that kind of case. The first is service on the person or an agent the way the Trial Rules generally provide — the ordinary methods used in any case. The second reaches outside Indiana: service on a person outside the state using the individual-service methods in Rule 4.1, or publication outside the state under Rule 4.13, or any other manner the Trial Rules allow, wherever that person happens to be. The third is service by publication under Rule 4.13, without needing to reach outside the state at all.
Because the case is anchored to property or a status located inside Indiana’s borders, the rule does not insist on the tighter service requirements a purely personal claim demands. A party can be reached by publication or by service outside Indiana in a way that lets the court decide rights in the res, even though that same kind of service would not be enough, on its own, to support a money judgment against that person individually.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as an “in rem action” under Rule 4.9?
An action involving a res — a specific piece of property or a legal status — situated within Indiana. Common examples include disputes over ownership of land, foreclosure, and other proceedings aimed at property or status rather than a personal money judgment against a particular defendant.
Can a court award me money damages using the service methods in Rule 4.9?
Rule 4.9 lets a court decide rights in the res to the extent of its jurisdiction over that res. Service made under this rule, particularly service by publication or outside the state, does not by itself establish the kind of personal jurisdiction needed for a personal money judgment against the defendant.
Can I serve an out-of-state defendant by publication under this rule?
What is a “res” in this context?
A res is the specific thing the lawsuit is about — real property, personal property, or a status — located within Indiana. It is the anchor that gives an Indiana court authority to decide rights in it, even over a defendant the court could not otherwise reach personally.
Do I still need to serve the defendant if the case only concerns property?
Yes. Rule 4.9 requires service under one of its listed methods before the court can decide rights affecting a party’s interest in the res. The rule broadens how that service can be accomplished — including publication and out-of-state service — but it does not eliminate the service requirement.