Section 23-37.—Summary Judgment in Habeas Corpus
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 23-37
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 529P.)
Plain-English Summary
Once the pleadings in a habeas proceeding are closed, either side may move for summary judgment. The judicial authority must render judgment for the moving party if the pleadings, affidavits, and any other evidence submitted show no genuine issue of material fact between the parties requiring a trial, and that party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
This is the same core standard used in ordinary civil summary judgment practice — no genuine dispute of material fact, and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law — applied here to the pleadings and record built up through the habeas case, including the return, reply, and any expanded record offered under Section 23-36.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can a party move for summary judgment in a habeas case?
At any time after the pleadings are closed, meaning after the petition, return, and any reply have been filed.
What must the court find to grant summary judgment in a habeas case?
The court must find that the pleadings, affidavits, and other submitted evidence show no genuine issue of material fact requiring a trial, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Can the respondent move for summary judgment, or only the petitioner?
The rule allows any party to move for summary judgment once the pleadings are closed, so either the petitioner or the respondent may bring the motion.
What evidence can the court consider on a summary judgment motion?
The pleadings, affidavits, and any other evidence submitted, which can include material from the expanded record described in Section 23-36.