Section 2-67.Payment of Attorneys by Bank and Trust Companies
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 2-67
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 48.)
Plain-English Summary
This rule stops attorneys from being paid by a bank or trust company for legal services they perform for someone else — specifically, preparing wills, codicils, or similar documents, or advising people about their legal rights under an existing or proposed will. The concern is direct: an attorney should answer to the client, not to a bank paying the bill for that client’s legal work.
An attorney who violates this rule can face grievance proceedings, the disciplinary process used to investigate and address attorney misconduct in Connecticut.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a bank pay an attorney to draft a will for a customer?
No. An attorney cannot directly or indirectly accept payment from a bank or trust company for preparing a will, codicil, or similar instrument for someone else, or for advising that person on their legal rights under it.
What happens if an attorney takes payment from a bank for this kind of work?
The violation can be cause for grievance proceedings against the attorney, the disciplinary process that investigates attorney misconduct.
Does this rule cover advice about existing wills too?
Yes. It covers payment for advising others about legal rights under existing instruments as well as proposed ones, not just drafting new documents.