Section 2-5A.—Good Moral Character and Fitness To Practice Law
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 2-5A
Amendment History
(Adopted June 21, 2010, to take effect Jan. 1, 2011; amended June 20, 2011, to take effect Sept. 1, 2011.)
Plain-English Summary
Section 2-5A breaks the character-and-fitness standard into two parts. Good moral character includes honesty, fairness, candor, and trustworthiness; observing fiduciary duties; respecting and obeying the law; and respecting the legal rights of others and the judicial process — shown through conduct beyond merely filing or defending lawsuits.
Fitness to practice law covers three abilities: the cognitive capacity to handle core lawyering tasks like problem solving, legal analysis, research, factual investigation, organizing legal work, and recognizing ethical dilemmas; the ability to communicate legal judgments and information to clients, other attorneys, and courts or regulators, with or without assistive aids or devices; and the capability to complete legal tasks on time.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as good moral character under Connecticut’s rule?
Honesty, fairness, candor, and trustworthiness; observing fiduciary responsibility; respecting and obeying the law; and respecting the legal rights of others and the judicial process.
What does fitness to practice law mean?
It means having the cognitive capacity for core lawyering skills, the ability to communicate legal information to clients and courts, and the capability to complete legal work on time.
Does using an aid or device affect a fitness determination?
No. The rule specifies that the ability to communicate legal judgments and information counts whether or not the applicant uses aids or devices.
Is filing a lawsuit itself evidence of poor character?
No. The rule says respect for the legal rights of others and the judicial process is shown by conduct other than merely initiating or pursuing litigation.