Section 17-55.—Conditions for Declaratory Judgment
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 17-55
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 390.) (Amended June 28, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000.)
Plain-English Summary
A declaratory judgment action may go forward only if all three conditions are met. First, the party seeking the judgment must have an interest, legal or equitable, arising from danger of loss or uncertainty about the party’s rights or other jural relations. Second, there must be an actual, bona fide, and substantial question or issue in dispute, or substantial uncertainty about legal relations, that requires settlement between the parties.
Third, if another form of proceeding exists that could give the party immediate redress, the action may still proceed only if the court decides that the party should be allowed to pursue the declaratory judgment claim despite that alternate procedure being available.
Frequently Asked Questions
What three conditions must be met to bring a declaratory judgment action?
The party must have a genuine interest tied to danger of loss or uncertainty about rights, there must be an actual and substantial dispute requiring settlement, and, if an alternate remedy exists, the court must find the party should be allowed to proceed anyway.
Can a party seek a declaratory judgment even if another remedy is available?
Yes, but only if the court is of the opinion that the party should be allowed to proceed with the declaratory judgment claim despite the existence of the alternate procedure.
Is a hypothetical disagreement enough to support a declaratory judgment action?
No. The rule requires an actual, bona fide, and substantial question or issue in dispute, or substantial uncertainty of legal relations requiring settlement between the parties.