Section 17-13.—Defendant’s Offer Not Accepted
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 17-13
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 344.) (Amended June 26, 2006, to take effect Jan. 1, 2007.)
Plain-English Summary
This section spells out what happens when a plaintiff lets a defendant’s offer of compromise lapse without filing a notice of acceptance before trial evidence begins. The offer is deemed withdrawn and cannot be shown to the jury. From that point, the plaintiff’s cost recovery is at risk: unless the plaintiff ultimately recovers more than the offer plus interest running from the offer’s date, the plaintiff cannot recover costs that accrued after receiving notice of the offer, and must instead pay the defendant’s costs from that same point. Those costs may include attorney’s fees up to $350, though the rule does not override any contract between the parties that separately governs fee recovery.
The section carves out one exception: it does not apply to cases where only nominal damages were assessed after a default or after a motion to strike was denied. In those situations, the usual cost-shifting consequence for missing the offer deadline does not kick in.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if a plaintiff does not accept a defendant's offer of compromise in time?
The offer is treated as withdrawn and cannot be used as evidence at trial, and the plaintiff risks losing costs and owing the defendant’s costs unless the final recovery beats the offer amount plus interest.
Can a plaintiff still win costs after missing the offer deadline?
Yes, if the plaintiff ultimately recovers more than the sum specified in the offer, with interest from the offer’s date, the cost-shifting consequence in this section does not apply.
Is there a cap on attorney's fees under this section?
The costs a plaintiff may owe the defendant can include reasonable attorney’s fees, but the rule caps that amount at $350 and does not disturb any separate contractual right to fees.
Does this rule apply to default or motion-to-strike cases?
No. The section expressly does not apply when only nominal damages were assessed after a default or after a motion to strike was denied.