Section 16-20.Requests To Charge and Exceptions; Necessity for
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 16-20
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 315.)
Plain-English Summary
An appellate court will not consider a claim that the trial judge gave a wrong instruction, or wrongly left one out, unless the party raising the claim first gave the trial court a chance to fix it. That happens one of two ways: the party filed a written request to charge covering the matter, or the party’s counsel took an exception immediately after the judicial authority finished delivering the charge to the jury.
An exception is not a bare objection. Counsel taking it must state distinctly what was objected to and the ground for the objection, so the judicial authority understands exactly what is being challenged and why. The exception itself must be taken outside the jury’s hearing, keeping the jury from being influenced by the legal dispute over the instructions it just received.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I preserve an objection to a jury instruction for appeal in Connecticut?
Either file a written request to charge covering the disputed matter, or have counsel take an exception immediately after the charge is delivered, stating distinctly the matter objected to and the ground for objection.
What happens if I never object to a jury instruction at trial?
An appellate court is not bound to consider a claim of error about that instruction unless a written request to charge or a timely exception covered it.
Can the jury hear my exception to the judge’s charge?
No. Section 16-20 requires that the exception be taken out of the jury’s hearing.
What must an exception to a jury charge include?
Counsel must state distinctly the matter objected to and the ground of the objection, not just a general objection to the charge.