Section 15-6.Opening Argument
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 15-6
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 296.)
Plain-English Summary
Rather than reading the pleadings to the jury, counsel for any party may give a brief opening statement laying out, in general terms, what the case is about. In a jury case this is permitted as a matter of course; in a court case, it rests in the presiding judge’s discretion whether to allow it. Either way, the presiding judge decides how much latitude counsel gets in making these statements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is an opening statement required in a Connecticut civil trial?
The section permits counsel to make a brief opening statement in place of reading the pleadings; it does not require one.
Can a party give an opening statement in a court case tried without a jury?
Yes, but it is up to the presiding judge’s discretion, unlike jury cases where a brief opening statement is permitted as a matter of course.
Who decides how detailed an opening statement can be?
The presiding judge has discretion over the latitude given to counsel’s opening statement.