Section 10-33.—Waiver and Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 10-33
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 145.)
Plain-English Summary
This rule draws a firm line under the waiver rule in Section 10-32. A claim that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case cannot be waived by anyone, at any point in the litigation. If the judicial authority learns—whether a party points it out or the court notices it on its own—that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the rule requires dismissal of the action.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a party waive an objection to subject matter jurisdiction in Connecticut?
No. Section 10-33 states that a claim of lack of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, no matter when it is raised or by whom.
What happens if a court discovers it lacks subject matter jurisdiction?
The judicial authority must dismiss the action, whether the parties raised the issue or the court found it on its own.
How is this different from the waiver rule for personal jurisdiction?
Section 10-32 says claims of lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of service are waived if not raised in a timely motion to dismiss. Section 10-33 carves out subject matter jurisdiction, which is never subject to that waiver.
Does a party have to file a motion to dismiss to raise subject matter jurisdiction?
The text does not tie the subject matter jurisdiction issue to any filing deadline—it can surface through a party’s suggestion or on the court’s own initiative at any time.