Section 1-21A.—Civil Contempt
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 1-21A
Amendment History
(Adopted June 28, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000.)
Plain-English Summary
Section 1-21A explains that violating any court order can support criminal contempt sanctions. But when the dispute is between private litigants and the point of the court’s intervention is remedial rather than punitive, the contempt is civil instead. Sanctions for civil contempt, including fines, must be coercive and nonpunitive — designed to secure compliance with the order and to compensate the complainant for losses caused by the violation.
If a violation of a court order makes that order unenforceable, the judicial authority should consider referring the matter for nonsummary criminal contempt proceedings instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between civil and criminal contempt in Connecticut?
Civil contempt arises from a dispute between private litigants and aims to coerce compliance and compensate the complainant, while criminal contempt is punitive and vindicates the court’s authority.
Can a judge fine someone for civil contempt?
Yes, but the fine must be coercive and nonpunitive — meant to ensure compliance with the order and compensate the complainant for losses, not to punish.
When does a civil contempt matter turn into a criminal contempt referral?
Where the violation of a court order renders the order unenforceable, the judicial authority should consider referring the matter for nonsummary criminal contempt proceedings.