Section 1-20.—Where No Right to Jury Trial in Nonsummary Proceeding
Current through August 12, 2025 (2026 Practice Book edition) · Last verified July 9, 2026
Full Text of Section 1-20
Amendment History
(P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 993.) (Amended June 28, 1999, to take effect Jan. 1, 2000.)
Plain-English Summary
Section 1-20 ties the right to a jury trial in a nonsummary contempt proceeding to the maximum punishment the judicial authority sets before trial begins. If the judicial authority declares in advance that the total effective sentence, should the defendant be found guilty, will not exceed thirty days imprisonment or a fine of $99, no right to a jury trial attaches.
If the judicial authority does not limit the potential sentence that way, and the total effective sentence may exceed thirty days imprisonment or a fine of more than $99, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does a defendant lose the right to a jury trial in a Connecticut contempt case?
When the judicial authority declares in advance of trial that the total effective sentence, if the defendant is found guilty, will not exceed thirty days imprisonment or a $99 fine.
What sentence threshold triggers the right to a jury trial for contempt?
If the total effective sentence may exceed thirty days imprisonment or a fine over $99, the defendant is entitled to a jury trial.
Who decides whether a contempt defendant gets a jury trial?
The judicial authority decides by declaring, in advance of trial, the ceiling on the total effective sentence the defendant could face.